- jwebb's home page
- Posts
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- 2015
- 2014
- 2013
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (1)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- April (1)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- September (3)
- August (5)
- July (6)
- June (6)
- May (1)
- April (5)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2010
- December (3)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (10)
- 2009
- 2008
- 2007
- 2006
- July (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
EEmc Gammas via conversion method, systematics
Updated on Thu, 2008-03-20 18:41. Originally created by jwebb on 2008-03-20 18:41.
EEmc Gammas via conversion method, systematics
Abstract: We investigate the systematic uncertainties associated with the conversion method. Specifically, does the Monte Carlo indicate that the efficiency for passing the preshower-2 cut depends significantly on either pT or eta?
Method:
1. Generate 20k single gammas and pi0s with
- flat eta distribution
- exponential pT distribution consistent with the slope of the isolated event sample here
2. Create gamma trees.
3. Apply the cuts discussed in section 1 of the conversion method writeup.
4. Take the ratio of the number of particles passing the preshower-2 cut to the number of particles passing the isolation cut.
Figure 1 -- εgamma(pT) and εgamma(η). MC is consistent with no significant pT or η dependance.
Figure 1 -- εpi0(pT) and εpi0(η). MC is consistent with no significant pT or η dependance.
Conclusions:
1. Within the statistical precision of this event sample, no significant variation with pT or eta is observed
2. We need more statistics, though... because a 5% deviation in the background efficiency corresponds to a large (~30%) deviation in the
3. We should also try to cross check any observed dependance with data, where feasible.
»
- jwebb's blog
- Login or register to post comments