- dilks's home page
- Posts
- 2019
- 2018
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- August (2)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (5)
- 2017
- December (3)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (2)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- January (3)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (3)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (6)
- June (3)
- May (3)
- April (4)
- March (3)
- February (5)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (3)
- July (3)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (1)
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
A_LL Binned in Run Regions
This page presents a study of A_LL vs. pT, plotted over 21 divisions with 50 runs each for the runs considered for analysis in run13.
The summary is that there is a region of runs where A_LL for 1<=pT<=5 GeV is inconsistent with the other runs; this region correpsonds directly to
the problematic region in the relative luminosity analysis (run indices 500-600) that still failed some diagnostic tests. This region is the same one
where we saw the "after-pulsing" shaped effect of rising scaler counts coming out of abort gaps, but was concluded to not be after-pulsing.
The attached pdf shows A_LL vs. pT where each page is a set of 50 runs.
The run numbers for each page are:
For each run period, I fit the region of 1<=pT<=5 GeV to a constant constrained at A_LL=0, to extract the chi2/ndf for the fit. This image shows
the chi2/ndf for each run region, where the horizontal axis corresponds to the run region via the page number from the table above;
The image on the right is a zoom in of the image on the left, showing the variation of chi2/ndf around 1.
For the zoomed in image, cutting out points with chi2/ndf >= 10; the pol0 fit returns chi2/ndf = 0.987966 +/- 0.15
The spike at run regions 10-11 corresponds directly to a "problematic region" in the relative luminosity that I addressed earlier. It is a region
that had worse agreement between E,W,X scaler bit combos as well as worse agreement between ZDC and VPD rellum means.
Here is the link to the relative luminosity analysis:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/dilks/2013/nov/25/scalers
- dilks's blog
- Login or register to post comments