- genevb's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- September (1)
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- October (4)
- September (2)
- August (6)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- 2018
- 2017
- December (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2015
- December (1)
- October (1)
- September (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (9)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (5)
- October (3)
- September (3)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (7)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2012
- December (2)
- November (6)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (7)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (3)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2011
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (9)
- March (5)
- February (6)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (3)
- November (6)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (5)
- July (1)
- June (4)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2009
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (6)
- August (4)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (5)
- April (5)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- 2008
- 2005
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Zero mag field operation
Discussion points for taking zero field data to use in TPC alignment
- Collider energy-ramp affected by STAR magnetic field
- Want the collider to ramp up with the STAR magnet on, then ramp down the STAR magnet before running?
- Beam time is precious during the low energy operations
- If we want beam, it will be easier to ask for during full energy (AuAu200)
- Can also run after the collider turns off in the summer with cosmics
- TPC,TOF,Trigger,DAQ would need to stay on, with people sitting gas shifts and acquiring the data (perhaps for a day or two after RHIC shutdown), but costs won't be bad because the magnet is the major expense
- Electric field distortions are still present
- In particular, the SpaceCharge will still be there, and GridLeak can still break and distort tracks
- Want low luminosity? For GridLeak, very low
- Jamie D. noted that z-dependent signed DCAs were observed in straight-up tracks using zero field data a decade ago by Bum Choi (when collision vertices were widely spread and there were good statistics for straight-up tracks at small drift distances)
- Distortion corrections (field cage shorts, field cage shifts, padrow 13, SpaceCharge, GridLeak), as currently implemented, expect a strong magnetic field principally along the z axis, and would need to be notably modified for zero field
- GridLeak sheet of charge will also diffuse significantly (all the more reason to use very low luminosity)
- In particular, the SpaceCharge will still be there, and GridLeak can still break and distort tracks
- Diffusion is much worse
- Clusters with long drift will be very broad, perhaps enough to cause fitting problems, and occupancy overlap
- ...But short drift length tracks have a larger dip angle, so their clusters are still long in the drift direction (though certainly better in transverse)
- Tracking code (and vertex finder?) already set up to handle zero field (treats tracks as very high pT)
- No reconstruction of track charge sign, pT, PID (TOF still available if helpful?)
- No guarantee that alignment without magnetic field is the same as with it (though it should be, and this should not be a reason to pass up on this)
_____________________
-Gene
Groups:
- genevb's blog
- Login or register to post comments