- genevb's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- September (1)
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- October (4)
- September (2)
- August (6)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- 2018
- 2017
- December (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2015
- December (1)
- October (1)
- September (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (9)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (5)
- October (3)
- September (3)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (7)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2012
- December (2)
- November (6)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (7)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (3)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2011
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (9)
- March (5)
- February (6)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (3)
- November (6)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (5)
- July (1)
- June (4)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2009
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (6)
- August (4)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (5)
- April (5)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- 2008
- 2005
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
First look at BeamLine in Run 13 pp510
I processed a few thousand events from run 14072098 with the chain:
VtxSeedCalG,B2013,ITTF,ppOpt,dEdxY2,btof,emcDY2,ZDCvtx,NosvtIT,NossdIT,trgd,hitfilt,VFMinuit3,BEmcChkStat,Corr4,OSpaceZ2,OGridLeak3D
Here are a few plots of the data:
y vs. x shows y is more offset from 0 than x, so y will be more sensitive to pile-up:
y vs. BEMC matches (capped at 7):
y vs. EEMC matches (capped at 7):
y vs. BTOF matches (capped at 7):
y vs. matches across the TPC central membrane (capped at 3):
And here is the very preliminary calibration, using a cut of "(mult>25&&(detmap&7)>0)||(mult>15&&(detmap&7)>3)", uploaded to the DB with a timestamp of 2013-03-01 00:00:00:
I also attempted to "see" the beampipe, but had no success in doing so.
-Gene
VtxSeedCalG,B2013,ITTF,ppOpt,dEdxY2,btof,emcDY2,ZDCvtx,NosvtIT,NossdIT,trgd,hitfilt,VFMinuit3,BEmcChkStat,Corr4,OSpaceZ2,OGridLeak3D
Here are a few plots of the data:
y vs. x shows y is more offset from 0 than x, so y will be more sensitive to pile-up:
y vs. BEMC matches (capped at 7):
y vs. EEMC matches (capped at 7):
y vs. BTOF matches (capped at 7):
y vs. matches across the TPC central membrane (capped at 3):
And here is the very preliminary calibration, using a cut of "(mult>25&&(detmap&7)>0)||(mult>15&&(detmap&7)>3)", uploaded to the DB with a timestamp of 2013-03-01 00:00:00:
row.x0 = -0.01031345; // cm : x intercept of x vs z line ; row.dxdz = -0.0003603694; // : slope of x vs z line ; row.y0 = -0.5831217; // cm : y intercept of y vs z line ; row.dydz = 0.0006101717; // : slope of y vs z line ; row.err_x0 = 0.00300816; // cm : error on x0 ; row.err_dxdz = 8.228317e-05; // : error on dxdz ; row.err_y0 = 0.003242227; // cm : error on y0 ; row.err_dydz = 8.380458e-05; // : error on dydz ; row.chisq_dof = 39.22777; // chi square / dof of fit ; row.weight = 100; // weight of seed to use in vertex-finding ; row.stats = 3801; // number of events used in seed-finding ;
I also attempted to "see" the beampipe, but had no success in doing so.
-Gene
Groups:
- genevb's blog
- Login or register to post comments