- genevb's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- September (1)
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- December (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2015
- December (1)
- October (1)
- September (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (3)
- 2014
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- January (3)
- 2010
- February (4)
- 2009
- 2008
- 2005
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
h-/h+ in Run 19 14.5 GeV with new TPC alignment
Updated on Thu, 2024-12-12 16:42. Originally created by genevb on 2024-12-11 10:57.
Using the P24iy_calib2 calibration production and repeating what I did for h-/h+ in Run 19 19.6 GeV with new TPC alignment ...
To begin, here are my usual set of fits and fit parameters for the double ratios of h-/h+:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23256/23256fbf3eba33ce2d73d0fe0b5986f6bb55e53e" alt=""
And the subsequent fit parameters:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9432f/9432fd59dbde18072442e35d5041c45a8af6bb44" alt=""
Next is a direct comparison with the results for the Run 19 AuAu 19.6 GeV collision data. Here I first show the west sectors, 1-12, with global tracks on the top two rows, and primary tracks on the lower two. The 19.6 GeV data is the darker colors red & blue, and the 14.5 GeV data is the lighter colors orange and cyan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0753/c0753fe22cfe099d394d7beedad333605b505704" alt=""
Similarly for the east sectors 13-24:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eedb/1eedbeea3fe1fcbadc13704bcea221fa92aafed2" alt=""
Retaining the same colors as above, here are the fit parameter comparisons for globals (top) and primaries (bottom), showing how the sector-to-sector variations are to first order unchanged between the two datasets, pointing to a static source of the variations (a static field distortion, or more likely, sector-wise alignments):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5defd/5defdeb2eec6554199c082e5938664c57ee27843" alt=""
-Gene
To begin, here are my usual set of fits and fit parameters for the double ratios of h-/h+:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23256/23256fbf3eba33ce2d73d0fe0b5986f6bb55e53e" alt=""
And the subsequent fit parameters:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9432f/9432fd59dbde18072442e35d5041c45a8af6bb44" alt=""
Next is a direct comparison with the results for the Run 19 AuAu 19.6 GeV collision data. Here I first show the west sectors, 1-12, with global tracks on the top two rows, and primary tracks on the lower two. The 19.6 GeV data is the darker colors red & blue, and the 14.5 GeV data is the lighter colors orange and cyan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0753/c0753fe22cfe099d394d7beedad333605b505704" alt=""
Similarly for the east sectors 13-24:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eedb/1eedbeea3fe1fcbadc13704bcea221fa92aafed2" alt=""
Retaining the same colors as above, here are the fit parameter comparisons for globals (top) and primaries (bottom), showing how the sector-to-sector variations are to first order unchanged between the two datasets, pointing to a static source of the variations (a static field distortion, or more likely, sector-wise alignments):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5defd/5defdeb2eec6554199c082e5938664c57ee27843" alt=""
-Gene
»
- genevb's blog
- Login or register to post comments