- genevb's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- September (1)
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- December (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2015
- December (1)
- October (1)
- September (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (3)
- 2014
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- January (3)
- 2010
- February (4)
- 2009
- 2008
- 2005
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Track-by-track analysis of Victor's proposed tracking code changes
Updated on Fri, 2016-06-24 13:21. Originally created by genevb on 2016-06-23 15:02.
Track-by-track analysis of Victor's proposed changes
Same dataset and methodology as in other recent studies (e.g. 1,2).
I. Victor's changes to Sti vs. DEV:
Fig. 1: Δ(Nhits) for modified matched tracks
Fig: 2: ratio of event reconstruction times for Victor / DEV
II. Victor's changes to StiCA vs. DEV:
Fig. 3: Δ(Nhits) for modified matched tracks
Fig. 4: fraction of tracks modifed vs. q/pT for matched tracks
Fig. 5: Δ(q/pT) vs. q/pT for matched tracks
Fig. 6: Δ(DCA) vs. q/pT for matched tracks
Fig. 7: ratio of event reconstruction times for Victor / DEV
III. Victor's bug fix to StiCA vs. Victor's StiCA
Fig. 8: Δ(q/pT) vs. q/pT for matched tracks
Fig. 9: Δ(pT) vs. q*pT for matched tracks
Fig. 10: ~ratio of event reconstruction times for fixed / unfixed
-Gene
Same dataset and methodology as in other recent studies (e.g. 1,2).
I. Victor's changes to Sti vs. DEV:
- 25 out of 131k (0.02%) matched tracks have differences in hits (and consequently tiny differences in track parameters; more lose hits than gain, ranging from [-7,+1] except for one with +5, see Fig. 1)
- 17 unmatched from DEV
- 7 unmatched from Victor
- No obvious phase space biases for unmatched or modified tracks other than low number of hits
- Victor's appears to run ~4% faster (see Fig. 2)
Fig. 1: Δ(Nhits) for modified matched tracks
Fig: 2: ratio of event reconstruction times for Victor / DEV
II. Victor's changes to StiCA vs. DEV:
- 884 out of 154k (0.6%) matched tracks have differences in track parameters; larger fraction of low-pT tracks (3%) affected than high-pT tracks (0.1%) (low-pT means large magnitude for q/pT as plotted, see Fig. 3)
- Modified tracks have negligible mean change in q/pT and DCA, with spreads of up to ~1 MeV/c and 100 μm respectively at low pT (see Figs. 5 & 6)
- 48 unmatched from DEV
- 21 unmatched from Victor
- No obvious phase space biases for unmatched tracks other than low number of hits
- Victor's appears to run ~4% slower (see Fig. 7)
Fig. 3: Δ(Nhits) for modified matched tracks
Fig. 4: fraction of tracks modifed vs. q/pT for matched tracks
Fig. 5: Δ(q/pT) vs. q/pT for matched tracks
Fig. 6: Δ(DCA) vs. q/pT for matched tracks
Fig. 7: ratio of event reconstruction times for Victor / DEV
III. Victor's bug fix to StiCA vs. Victor's StiCA
- Nearly all matched tracks (129k) are modified
- On average, 0.05 hits lost per track
- On average, ~1.5 MeV/c in pT gained per track, with an odd pT dependence (see Figs. 8 & 9)
- 26k unmatched from Victor's StiCA
- 28k unmatched from Victor's bug-fixed StiCA
- Unmatched fractions higher at large DCA (~30% at DCA of ~2cm!), low pT, and low number of hits
- Bug-fixed appears to run ~8% faster (see Fig. 10)
Fig. 8: Δ(q/pT) vs. q/pT for matched tracks
Fig. 9: Δ(pT) vs. q*pT for matched tracks
Fig. 10: ~ratio of event reconstruction times for fixed / unfixed
-Gene
»
- genevb's blog
- Login or register to post comments