- heppel's home page
- Posts
- 2021
- July (3)
- 2020
- February (1)
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (3)
- June (5)
- May (8)
- April (4)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (4)
- October (8)
- September (4)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (7)
- May (8)
- April (5)
- March (13)
- February (5)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (1)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (3)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (1)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (6)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2009
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
AnalysisDay68(Monday)
I have done an analysis of runs 16068021 16068022 16068023.
This is about 7 million events.
This also represents a voltage change is the North small cells but does not involve new trigger conditions.
There has not yet been a round of improving correction factors after the voltage change.
The mass plots in rapidity bins are here (note the histogram names for pseudo-rapidity and energy info)
The events were analyzed for two photon events in a 0.035 Radian cone and with Z<.7. All FMS triggers were allowed.
The HTML file that represents the starting point for additional iterations is here.
Also attached is a plot of one photon events in the same cone. The plot shows the x-y distribution of photon positions.
To look at the pT distribution for selected triggers and eta bins look at the file and refer back to drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/heppel/analysisrun16066027, although this assignment of triggers to lastdsm[5] has been questioned. Trigbits on these plots referrs to lastdsm[5].
- heppel's blog
- Login or register to post comments