- oleg's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- February (1)
- 2022
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (3)
- March (4)
- January (1)
- 2015
- 2014
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (3)
- June (1)
- May (3)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2013
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
FMS Run 15 Analysis: Vertex Reconstruction
Updated on Thu, 2016-03-10 11:01. Originally created by oleg on 2016-03-10 10:41.
(1)
Vertex distribution will lead to significant smearing of invariant mass.
PYTHIA J/psi simulation with both leptons in the FMS acceptance:
- vertex distribution (sigma=50 cm)
- no vertex reconstruction included in the analysis
- mass smeared by about 200 MeV
(2)
Vertex reconstruction with BBC is not calibrated
- TAC difference is EAST - WEST (scale 0.02 ns/ch)
- early time = high TAC, late time = low TAC
- large difference = positive z-vertex (towards FMS)
Correlation with primary vertices from tracks
- very low efficiency (0.2%)
- scale for TAC looks different when no cut on vertex rank is applied (slope should be 100 cm per 300 ch)
- currently just calculating the mean <z_TPC> in slices of BBC TAC-difference
- asymmetric features of tails look consistent, but z_TPC definitely has non-Gaussian peak structure
- (figure includes half of pp200_trans)
- rerunning with cut on vertex rank
(analysis comments)
StMuDst->event()->bbcTriggerDetector is obsolete
- use StMuDst->event()->triggerData()
StMuDst->event()->primaryVertexPosition()
- same as StMuDst->primaryVertex()->position()
- rank is only available through primaryVertex()
Vertex distribution will lead to significant smearing of invariant mass.
PYTHIA J/psi simulation with both leptons in the FMS acceptance:
- vertex distribution (sigma=50 cm)
- no vertex reconstruction included in the analysis
- mass smeared by about 200 MeV
(2)
Vertex reconstruction with BBC is not calibrated
- TAC difference is EAST - WEST (scale 0.02 ns/ch)
- early time = high TAC, late time = low TAC
- large difference = positive z-vertex (towards FMS)
Correlation with primary vertices from tracks
- very low efficiency (0.2%)
- scale for TAC looks different when no cut on vertex rank is applied (slope should be 100 cm per 300 ch)
- currently just calculating the mean <z_TPC> in slices of BBC TAC-difference
- asymmetric features of tails look consistent, but z_TPC definitely has non-Gaussian peak structure
- (figure includes half of pp200_trans)
- rerunning with cut on vertex rank
(analysis comments)
StMuDst->event()->bbcTriggerDetector is obsolete
- use StMuDst->event()->triggerData()
StMuDst->event()->primaryVertexPosition()
- same as StMuDst->primaryVertex()->position()
- rank is only available through primaryVertex()
»
- oleg's blog
- Login or register to post comments