Spin Physics PWG meeting

2008-09-30 17:00
2008-09-30 19:00
Etc/GMT-4
Tuesday, 30 September 2008
evo - http://evo.caltech.edu/evoGate/koala.jnlp?meeting=ete8eavtv9alaMItaiIt, at 21:00 (GMT), duration : 02:00

Evo: http://evo.caltech.edu/evoGate/koala.jnlp?meeting=ete8eavtv9alaMItaiIt

Phone: ID 540111, Password 7894, relevant bridge-lines

    USA (BNL, Upton, NY) +1 631 344 6100

   USA (Caltech, Pasadena, CA) +1 626 395 2112

 

TimeTalkPresenter
00:00Di-jet Production Cross Section and Double Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in sqrt(s) = 200 GeV pp at RHIC ( 00:20 ) 1 fileTai Sakuma
00:20Longitudinal double-spin asymmetries for inclusive charged pion production opposite a jet ( 00:20 ) 0 filesAdam Kocoloski
00:40Update on FPDE Run 8 ( 00:20 ) 1 fileJim Drachenberg

spectra

mcasym-qq

mcasym-qg

mcasym-gg

Monte Carlo Asymmetries

Here are the asymmetries for STD, ZERO, GS-C, and MIN that I get out of PYTHIA with the minbias trigger condition applied:

Figure 1: raw minbias asymmetries

and here’s what I get after applying the pT reweighting:

Figure 2: minbias asymmetries after reweighting jet pT spectrum

Figure 3: jetpatch asymmetries

Figure 4: difference between Figures 3 and 1

Figure 5: difference between Figures 3 and 2

Finally, these four plots show the effect of the minbias pT reweighting on the bias systematic for each scenario:

Reweighting the MB pT spectrum

Subprocess Fractions



Study of ET Correction Factor Single Thrown Particle

ET Correction Factor Study using Single Particles

 

JP1 & JP2 Turn on efficiency

I used the 2006 MuDsts to generate the turn on curves for the JP1 and JP2 triggers. Both plots are integrated over all jet patches.

Concerning the 'floating' mass peak and Zgg

 Objective:

Explore the pt-dependent mean mass position in data and MC and perhaps draw some conclusions about the quality of our simulations.

Details:

Hermes alignment system

Hermes ref

Congratulations to Paul Sorensen!

7 PR track plots with UPGR16 & fixed barrel

Under:

Geometry= UPGR16, 6 FGT disks , fixed barrel geometry.

Single electrons, 20 GeV ET, thrown at eta=0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0


Fig 1, Z vertex=0

Elliptic flow fluctuation in collisions of deformed nuclei

Speaker : Peter Filip ( Particle Physics Lab., Dubna )


Talk time : 12:00, Duration : 00:20

06 BNL 26Sep@008 Meeting

Under:

FEE Design

W Program talk for SPIN 2008

Draft for practice talk at analysis meeting

spin goals run 9 draft talk

Draft of run 9 goals attached

Special Attention Ought to be Paid to Zgg

The collaboration has concerns about the SMD, and not without reason.  They, they SMDs, have been notoriously hard to understand and model.

Mean pT in z bins

I looked into the mean transverse momentum for pions and jets in each of my z bins. First, here’s a comparison of data (black points) and Monte Carlo (red lines) for the BJP1 trigger:

It looks good to me, so I went on to compare simulations for jet patch and minimum-bias triggers:

In hindsight, this plot makes perfect sense — the trigger hardens the pT spectrum for the jets, so each JP z bin (which integrates over 10-25 GeV) has a higher average jet p_{T} than the MB version.

Now, this 3 GeV p_{T} shift means that we’re biasing the sample in each z bin towards higher x. This is almost certainly the source of the observed trigger bias in the Monte Carlo asymmetries for π+. So, what’s the next step?