HFT software weekly meeting

2007-07-27 13:00
2007-07-27 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 27 July 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 17:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
 
TimeTalkPresenter
13:00Update on CD0 proposal ( 00:10 ) 0 filesDiscussion
13:10Pixel Pile-up simulations ( 00:20 ) 0 filesDiscussion
13:30'Low efficiency' investigations ( 00:10 ) 0 filesWillie (moderator)
13:40GEANT simulations for a 'Patch prototype' ( 00:10 ) 0 filesSpiros and Jaiby
14:50Other updates ( 00:10 ) 0 filesDiscussion

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-11-30 13:00
2007-11-30 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 30 November 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 18:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
 
TimeTalkPresenter
13:00Proposed agenda/softw talks at LBL vetting review Dec 17/18 ( 00:20 ) 0 filesAll
13:20D0 background estimation ( 00:20 ) 2 filesJan
13:40Tests with new geometry, single IST layer ( 00:20 ) 1 fileWillie,Jan, Spiros
14:00Albedo from the support structure ( 00:10 ) 0 filesQuan Wang

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-08-03 13:00
2007-08-03 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 3 August 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 17:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
 

HFT software meetings will be intermittent during the month of August.

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-12-14 13:00
2007-12-14 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 14 December 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 18:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00

 

CD0 REVIEW REHEARSALS 

TimeTalkPresenter
13:00Spiros' talk ( 00:20 ) 1 fileSpiros
13:20Jim's talk ( 00:20 ) 1 fileJim
13:40Xin's talk ( 00:20 ) 1 fileXin

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-08-10 13:00
2007-08-10 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 10 August 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 17:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
 

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-12-21 13:00
2007-12-21 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 21 December 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 18:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00

 

CD0 REVIEW REHEARSALS 

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-08-17 13:00
2007-08-17 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 17 August 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 17:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
 

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-08-24 13:00
2007-08-24 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 24 August 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 17:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
 

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-08-31 13:00
2007-08-31 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 31 August 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 17:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
 

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-09-07 13:00
2007-09-07 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 7 September 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 17:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
 
TimeTalkPresenter
13:00General updates on proposal, review etc ( 00:10 ) 0 filesAll
13:10Progress on (d)efficiency ( 00:20 ) 0 filesWillie
13:30Pile up ( 00:20 ) 1 fileAll (Wei Xie convenor)
13:50Other updates ( 00:10 ) 0 filesAll

HFT software weekly meeting

2007-09-14 13:00
2007-09-14 14:00
Etc/GMT-5
Friday, 14 September 2007
Phone: 510-4867333, at 17:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
 
TimeTalkPresenter
01:00Updates/News from the monthly TC meeting at LBL ( 00:15 ) 0 filesS. Margetis
01:15PileUp udpade ( 00:15 ) 1 fileWei Xie
01:30Chain for perfect TPC ( 00:10 ) 2 filesWillie
01:40Timeline to CD0 review - AOB ( 00:20 ) 0 filesAll

Anything Else


Talk time : 01:10, Duration : 00:20

Pedestal Status

Speaker : Jonathan


Talk time : 00:50, Duration : 00:20

Talk for DAQ1000 Workshop?


Talk time : 00:30, Duration : 00:20

SSD Removal and Testing - Status

Speaker : Stephane


Talk time : 00:10, Duration : 00:20

STAR Rollout Satus


Talk time : 00:00, Duration : 00:10

BTOW pedestal comparison -- emcOnline vs. L2ped

I wrote a script that compares each Run 7 BTOW pedestal table with a corresponding L2ped printout. The script queries the RunLog_onl database for the runnumber immediately preceding the table timestamp, then it looks for a log file corresponding to that runnumber in the L2ped directory on online.star.bnl.gov. If it can’t find the precise runnumber, it compares the online pedestals to the next closest L2ped runnumbers both before and after, and then prints the comparison for the better match.

Here’s a summary log printing the number of channels per table where

  1. the difference in pedestal value is greater than 4, or
  2. the difference in pedestal sigma is greater than 1.5

There are a handful of channels per run with drastic differences. For example, emcOnline will declare a zero pedestal, but l2ped will say there’s a peak at 3500 ADCs. Channels like these are obviously bad. Of greater concern are the runnumbers where several hundred channels do not match. Most of the time it’s because the widths are different, but occasionally there are runs where a few hundred towers will have pedestals that differ by more than 4 ADCs. The full verbose output (listing every tower that fails the cut) can be found here.

Documents

Under:

 

SQM Report: thermal models

Speaker : Lee Barnby


Talk time : 00:50, Duration : 00:10

Discussion on thermal models in the light of presentations at SQM (time permitting)

DAQ 1000 / Future Analysis Discussion

Speaker : All


Talk time : 00:30, Duration : 00:20

Discussion on our input to DAQ1000 workshop (August 16/17th at BNL).