- genevb's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- September (1)
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- October (4)
- September (2)
- August (6)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- 2018
- 2017
- December (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2015
- December (1)
- October (1)
- September (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (9)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (5)
- October (3)
- September (3)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (7)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2012
- December (2)
- November (6)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (7)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (3)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2011
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (9)
- March (5)
- February (6)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (3)
- November (6)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (5)
- July (1)
- June (4)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2009
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (6)
- August (4)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (5)
- April (5)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- 2008
- 2005
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Run 12 UU h-/h+ initial test sample for new alignment
I processed ~45k st_centralpro Run 12 UU193 events (using runs scattered over the UU operations duration) with and without the new TPC alignment, using the following two chains in SL14h:
Old alignment: DbV20120921,P2012b,AgML,btof,BEmcChkStat,Corr4,OSpaceZ2,OGridLeak3D,-hitfilt
New alignment: DbV20140919,P2012b,AgML,btof,BEmcChkStat,CorrX,Corr4,OSpaceZ2,OGridLeak3D,-hitfilt
(note: I had to use a local version of Run 12 UU TPC T0 with new alignment as this is not yet available from the database)
I used the same track-wise cuts as Rihan did in his h-/h+ study of primary tracks for Run 12 UU using the official P12id production, however I implemented no event-wise cuts. The results are shown below. Some observations with the new TPC alignment compared to the old:
-Gene
Old alignment: DbV20120921,P2012b,AgML,btof,BEmcChkStat,Corr4,OSpaceZ2,OGridLeak3D,-hitfilt
New alignment: DbV20140919,P2012b,AgML,btof,BEmcChkStat,CorrX,Corr4,OSpaceZ2,OGridLeak3D,-hitfilt
(note: I had to use a local version of Run 12 UU TPC T0 with new alignment as this is not yet available from the database)
I used the same track-wise cuts as Rihan did in his h-/h+ study of primary tracks for Run 12 UU using the official P12id production, however I implemented no event-wise cuts. The results are shown below. Some observations with the new TPC alignment compared to the old:
- Less primary tracks are reconstructed in all quadrants of -/+ charge and pseudorapidity
- h-/h+ is closer between east and west TPC, by a factor of ~x3 better as determined by the vaue of B from a fit to (A + B * pT2)
- TPC distortions usually introduce effects that scale as pT2
- The overall scale value of the east/west double ratio (i.e. A, the value as pT → 0) may be offset from 1.0 due to different east vs. west acceptances of different charge signs because of dead channels int the TPC
- There is reason to believe a few specific sectors have incorrect GridLeak distortion corrections, which could contibute to the remaining east vs. west discrepancy; a sector-by-sector analysis (requiring at least x12 statistics) would elucidate
- h-/h+ is closer to 1.0 at high pT for both east and west
-Gene
Groups:
- genevb's blog
- Login or register to post comments