HFT ( Heavy Flavor Tracker ), the Silicon Vertex Upgrade of STAR experiment
Run-15 |
PXL (Main) |
IST [new] |
SSD [new] |
Information and link to other pages relevant for operation, Q&A, calibrations, and running considerations. Content will be added as it becomes available.
Physics Goals and Triggering
Sub- systems
ALIGNMENT: |
SURVEY [PIXEL, IST, SSD] | GEOMETRY |
[PXL-PROTOTYPE(old)] QA (Shusu) , RUN14-QA pages |
REPORTS [Software MONTHLY] |
SIMULATIONS [starlight-docs, CVS][digmaps] |
MEETINGS Disk Space Needs |
Developers guidlines/help Dmetric definition |
CURRENT ACTIVITIES/TASK LIST |
ACTIVITY/TASK | STATUS | WHO | Comments | Links |
RECONSTRUCTION | ||||
PXL Cluster Finder Hit Finder |
--- In progress In progress |
--- Jan/Hao/? Jan/Hao/? |
||
IST Cluster Finder Hit Finder |
--- pending pending |
--- Yaping Yaping |
||
SSD Cluster Finder Hit Finder update |
--- TBD TBD |
--- ?/Jonathan ?/Jonathan |
||
SIMULATION | ||||
GEOMETRY IDS - BeamPipe - Other PXL - RUN13 PXL - RUN14 IST SSD |
--- In progress In progress In progress In progress In progress |
--- Flem./Jon./Amilkar/? Flem./Jon./Amilkar Flem./Jon./? Yaping/? Jon./Amilkar/? |
||
PXL SIMULATORS Fast Slow Mixer (embedding) |
--- In progress Design phase Pending |
Mustafa, ? | ||
IST SIMULATORS Fast Slow Mixer (embedding) |
--- In progress Pending Pending |
Yaping, ? | ||
VMC Hit recorder Tracking |
--- studying examples TBD |
--- Spiros ??? |
||
CALIBRATIONS | CVS | |||
PXL Calibrations (includes local->Global) Db makers |
Long, Hao, Xin, Jon. | |||
IST Calibrations (includes local->Global) Db makers |
Yaping, Zhenyu | |||
SSD Calibrations (includes local->Global) Db makers |
||||
ANALYSIS CODES | ||||
DCA Plots for Run14 and Aluminum only
The document with the latest DCA plots on page 8 [all ladders] and page 9 [ Aluminum only]
is attached below (HFT Transitions to Operations).
I also put the .root files of these figures on the web here:
http://phys.kent.edu/~margetis/STAR/HFT/index.php?dir=&file=Prod14-DCAxy-p-Alum.root
http://phys.kent.edu/~margetis/STAR/HFT/index.php?dir=&file=Prod14-DCAz-p-Alum.root
http://phys.kent.edu/~margetis/STAR/HFT/index.php?dir=&file=Prod14new-DCAxy-p-Full.root
http://phys.kent.edu/~margetis/STAR/HFT/index.php?dir=&file=Prod14new-DCAz-p-Full.root
DATA
SIMULATIONS
TpcOnGlobal [from Db]
entryTime | beginTime | flavor | LocalxShift | LocalyShift | LocalzShift | PhiXY | PhiXZ | PhiYZ | XX | YY | ZZ | PhiXY_geom | PhiXZ_geom | PhiYZ_geom |
2014-03-17 00:59:50 | 2014-02-12 00:00:01 | ofl | -0.17800000 | -0.67519999 | -0.08086000 | 0.00000000 | -0.00035000 | -0.00027000 | 1.00000000 | 1.00000000 | 1.00000000 | 0.00096220 | -0.00018970 | -0.00004400 |
DEFINITIONS: $STAR/StDb/idl/tpcGlobalPosition.idl
* Table: tpcGlobalPosition description: */
struct tpcGlobalPosition {
float LocalxShift; /* cm : x position of TPC center in magnet frame */
float LocalyShift; /* cm : y position of TPC center in magnet frame */
float LocalzShift; /* cm : z position of TPC center in magnet frame */
float PhiXY; /* radians: rotation angle around z axis (not used) */
float PhiXZ; /* radians: rotation angle around y axis XTWIST */
float PhiYZ; /* radians: rotation angle around x axis YTWIST */
float XX; /* XX element of rotation matrix (not used) */
float YY; /* YY element of rotation matrix (not used) */
float ZZ; /* ZZ element of rotation matrix (not used) */
float PhiXY_geom; /* radians: geometrical rotation angle around z axis psi, -gamma (not used) */
float PhiXZ_geom; /* radians: geometrical rotation angle around y axis theta,-beta */
float PhiYZ_geom; /* radians: geometrical rotation angle around x axis psi, -alpha */ };
PXL PxlOnPst
[/star/u/qiuh/hft/DbRun14/surveyAndCalibration/StarDb/Geometry/pxl ]
1, 0.000129826, 0.000299546, -0.000129848, 1, 7.36199e-05, -0.000299536, -7.36588e-05, 1,
0.0183753, -0.000644915, -0.0221809
PXL Half-on-Pixel
Original Survey (Bob):
0.999999, -0.000890449, -0.00131775, 0.000890639, 1, 0.000143418, 0.00131762, -0.000144591, 0.999999,
-0.0470471, 0.00022503, -0.00608269,
0.999999, 0.000890661, 0.00131761, -0.000890471, 1, -0.000144552, -0.00131774, 0.000143379, 0.999999,
0.0470471, -0.00022503, 0.00608269,
Alex's original corrections:
M =
|0.999988 -0.00049038 -0.00482335|
|0.000485125 0.999999 -0.00109049|
|0.00482388 0.00108814 0.999988|
shift_vector = {-0.199987, -0.0586518, -0.00557364} in cm
After averaging
0.999999, -0.000646411, 0.00109379, 0.000645657, 1, 0.000689533, -0.00109424, -0.000688826, 0.999999,
0.052902, 0.0295242, -0.00356489,
0.999999, 0.000646971, -0.00109437, -0.000647725, 0.999999, -0.000688232, 0.00109393, 0.000688943, 0.999999,
-0.052902, -0.0295242, 0.00356489,
PXL SectorOnHalf [sample]
[/star/u/qiuh/hft/DbRun14/surveyAndCalibration/StarDb/Geometry/pxl ]
Sector-1
0.999998, -0.00195912, -0.00070653, 0.00195803, 0.999997, -0.0015296, 0.000709523, 0.00152821, 0.999999,
0.0110013, 0.00218197, -0.00736481
......
Sector-10
0.999996, 0.00259448, 0.00143927, -0.00258847, 0.999986, -0.00454193, -0.00145104, 0.00453818, 0.999988, 0.0134133, -0.0565213, 0.00166389
PXL SensorTPS/SensorOnLadder/LadderOnSector are here:
[/star/u/qiuh/hft/DbRun14/surveyAndCalibration/StarDb/Geometry/pxl ]
----->CD4 DOCUMENTS<-------
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/future/proposals/hft-project/opa-review-july-31-2014
----->Older stuff<---------
Yifei's efficiency plots are here
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/heavy/yfzhang/hft/plots/CD4/
Daniel's UPC electrons page: here and here (recent) and here (latest)
Amilkar's Hijing events area:
/star/u/aquinter/ksu/Run14/Simulation/Hijing/VFMinuit or KFVertex/hijing.*.root
For Thin/Thick case DCA documents:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/cd23_homework_0.pdf
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/pointingResolution_summary_nolog.pdf
Here is a summary of Points of View and Space requests
General Comments:
- We should consider this to be a request in addition to our existing institutional disks, which are mainly devoted for user analysis and not planned specifically for the HFT calibration.
- (Xin)I think for us, the big request will come from the simulation production and tracking test. My verbal comment on Friday about >10TB is a rough estimate to have sufficient buffering space for this test. I believe the total space we really need may be larger than that (which is hard to estimate now). 10TB should be a good start. And we may approach with the S&C team as some of the tracking test is not particularly only related to us, it should be a global interest.
Subsystem Calibrations:
The PXL calibration shouldn't need too much space, we may need to finish some missing runs, but that in principle can be made as a subsystem request to the production team.
SSD calibration may need some amount of space. Jonathan/team may have a better estimate.
IST needs ~4TB disk space for calibration and performance studies. At the moment, Yaping is using 1.5 TB disk space for IST performance study, alignment and code development, while Babak 1.1TB for IST calibration. They are using their own data01+data02 disk spaces plus temporary data05, as UIC does not have institutional disk space (even if we do, this kind of IST work should be on dedicated disk space, not institutional one). So when I add these numbers up with 1TB of contingency, I get 4TB.
Request: It looks like a request of ~15 Tb if we consider the IST/SSD calibration needs and the big chunk of ~10 Tb for simu and data sample analyses.
P.S. the numbers others are requesting
MTD: 25TB
BEMC: 2TB
FGT: 1TB
EEMC: 1TB
There are two important areas that fall under our responsibility:
1) Physics analysis code/performance simulations
The committe (see also the attached .doc file) asked for more detailed simulation of
a) D0s : flow and RAA performance with realistic systematic errors
b) B-meson capabilites quantified (see Question-3/4 related attached docs)
* reconstruction channels, methods, rates
* triggering
- To begin look at the attached ppt file on B-meson work done for the SVT and some thoughts in attached Question_3.ppt file
- The Yale group is willing to help someone start on this. Gang Wang (UCLA) and also Quan Wang (Purdue) have volunteered to work on this.
c) L_c capabilities also quantified since these are unique to STAR
- Jan Kapitan is currently refining his analysis using the CD0/UPGR13 production
- YiFei is also interested (also in using TOF+HFT)
2) Infrastructure/Development
a) Geometry. We need to move on and build/use a new geometry for our simulations. This impacts the Simulators and the tracking optimization. Gerrit initialized already the discussion with Andrew but expert help is critical.
b) Tracking. We need to reconcile hand/Geant numbers, aka debug/optimize Sti performance. BNL core group involvemen is a must here. We need to clean our code from fuzzy factors etc. Simplification of geometry for this particular study might be a good idea. Work on this item is reported in Tracking Efficiency Investigations
c) Simulators. Xin Li (Purdue) showed interest in this task. He will present an outline of a plan soon.
d) Calibration/Alignment procedures. Spiros to visit LBL to gather info from survey people.
e) Web interface uplift. Willie will help with initial effort. Some templates were posted (see minutes of 3/21/08) HFT software meeting
This is an non prioritized list. We need to agree on an action plan with a timeline since the time for a new production for CD1 is near (before summer).
Drafts for Software Chapters in HFT-CDR
The area where most recent talks/results/ were presented is at
rnc.lbl.gov/~jhthomas/public/HFT/
The code is on rcf in:
~jhthomas/STAR/hft/DetectorDesignV5.C (good on 10/1/2007)
It compiles in root with
>.x DetectorDesignV5.C++
The macro is sort of self-documented.
Code developers need to keep in mind that:
1) Need to follow STAR code standards
2) Need to supply some documentation. Tutorial [example]
3) Packages need to be peer reviewed
Below are attached some older 'HOW TO' documents.......
Jan's pages are HERE
The Heavy Flavor Tracker (HFT) project is part of the STAR upgrades for midterm and RHIC-II running.
A CD-0 proposal has been prepared and submitted to BNL (August 30) for submission to DOE. The proposal was submitted to DOE by the ALD S.Vigdor on about October 2. It can be found HERE
and it is also attached at the bottom of the page.
A CD-0 review is expected sometimes in January of 2008
This page will keep final documents on the project and documentation for the sub-systems (PIXEL, IST) and links to relevant other information.
The project meetings are documented mainly via links to agenda and presentation or via other page.
So far this only includes the monthly meetings.
Later meetings can be found here
This page will contain the talks given at the meeting the program was.
HFT cd0- dry run and vetting review
8:30-9:00 Committee closed session
09:00 Introduction T. Hallman 20+10
09:40 Physics motivation N.Xu 40+10
10:50 Break
11:15 Software overview S. Margetis 20+10 (by Phone from Kent)
11:45 Performance simulations J. Thomas 30+10
12:30 Lunch - committee closed session
14:00 Monte Carlo results X. Dong 20+10
14:40 IST B. Surrow 20+10
15:30 PIXEL H. Wieman 30+10
17:00 -18:00 Committee closed session (home work questions)
Tuesday, Dec 18
09:00 HFT Mechanics E. Anderssen 30+10 (presentation by Phone from CERN)
09:40 Project overview HG. Ritter 30+10
10:20 Cost & Schedule S. Morgan 20+10
10:40 Summary F. Videbaek 10+10
11:30 Presentation on Home work
12:00 Committee Lunch
14:00- Closeout
Panel Members:
Carl Gagliardi (Chair)
Carlos Lourenco
Tom LeCompte
Dick Majka
Lanny Ray
Steve Vigdor, ex-officio
The first attached file describe the expected performance of RHIC with stochastic and e-cooling. The emphasis is on the bunch lengths and distributions.
This page will contain information on publication, conference proceedings and presentation on HFT related talks.
This are all non-project talks.
Work in progress (12/10/14)
Publications
Conference Proceedings
Presentations
>>> Integration Status >>> | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Development Area e.g. $CVSROOT/offline/hft/ or private directories |
Official Area $CVSROOT/ |
|||
PXL | ||||
StRoot/ | StPxlClusterMaker/ | Review complete | Deployed | |
StPxlDbMaker/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StPxlHitMaker/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StPxlMonMaker/ |
Under review. Non critical for data reconstruction chain | |||
StPxlRawHitMaker/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StPxlSimMaker/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StPxlUtil/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StEvent/ | XXX: List individual files for clarity | Deployed. May benefit from changes as for IST. For example, there are constants defined multiple times | ||
StiPxl/ | Deployed but still may benefit from a review | |||
StarDb/Geometry/pxl/ | DB tables initialized | |||
IST | ||||
StRoot/ | StIstCalibrationMaker/ | To be reviewed. Non critical for data reconstruction chain | ||
StIstClusterMaker/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StIstDbMaker/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StIstSimMaker/ |
Review complete | Deployed | ||
StIstHitMaker/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StIstQAMaker/ | To be reviewed. Non critical for data reconstruction chain. Should it be renamed to StIstMonMaker similar to StPxlMonMaker? | |||
StIstRawHitMaker/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StIstUtil/ | Review complete | Deployed | ||
StEvent/ | Reviewed by Thomas. |
Deployed | ||
StiIst | Deployed but still may benefit from a review | |||
StarDb/Geometry/ist | DB tables initialized | |||
SSD | ||||
StRoot/ | StSsdClusterMaker/ | Empty module. The code is in StSsdPointMaker/ | ||
StSsdDaqMaker/ | Expect new code in StSstDaqMaker/ | |||
StSsdDbMaker/ | Reuse existing code | |||
StSsdMonMaker/ | Updates available in Jonathan's private directory | Updated existing module with SST related code | ||
StSsdEvalMaker/ | Empty module. Apparently not used | |||
StSsdFastSimMaker/ | Reuse existing code | |||
StSsdPointMaker/ | Updates available in Jonathan's private directory | Updated existing module with SST related code | ||
StSsdSimulationMaker/ | Reuse existing code | |||
StSsdUtil/ | Reuse existing code | |||
StSstDaqMaker/ | Peer review in progress... | |||
StiSsd | Updated existing module with SST related code | |||
StarDb/Geometry/ssd/ | Directory exists but the content is ~3 years old |
— Implementation stage | |
— Review stage | |
— Code can be moved to $CVSROOT | |
— Ready for extensive testing with production libraries |