Follow-up of Stv performances

Under:

This page will list material for the follow-up review of Stv performances.

Material

Other information

Review findings and key points/problems

The review recommendations for focii were

  • Hit residuals and track chi2 should be the first problems to be addressed
  • Tracking inefficiencies, pT and charge dependences for reconstructed tracks, and charge separation for high pT tracks need to be reevaluated after Stv tuning and optimization.
  • Implementation of the track extensions to other detector volumes is necessary for the Stv to become the truly integrated STAR tracker.
  • Extension to the TOF detector is recommended to be next on the priority list

 

The review finding details included

  • No documentation is available on the method (in general), and its specific implementation - this needs to be addressed
    • Appropriate documentation needs to be created for the track predictors to other detector elements, with detailed workflow of the algorithm to be worked out with the relevant subsystem groups
  • CPU resources: Stv uses twice the CPU resources - recommends addressing this matter before a full deployment is attempted (and along development)
     
  • The ability of the Stv to properly account for the material budget is unclear at the moment, as performance tests uncovered significant losses in the dead material
  • The importance of optimizing PPV VF within Stv (work toward optimization should be pursued by the developers from both, S&C and VF teams)
  • The implementation of the track extension method into volumes other than the TPC was not reviewed by this committee. The validity of an extrapolated covariance matrix was not discussed. Integration of all sub-systems, for example FGT and TOF, into the tracking model should become a major focus of the project
  • Integration of forward detector geometries has not been showed
  • The possibility to have track fits using different mass assumptions has not been presented
     
  • Performance were not all understood:
    • The pT dependence of the tracking reconstruction efficiency is not entirely understood (degraded resolution of charge sign reconstruction)
    • The ψ resolutions and pulls were found to be slightly worse for Stv compared to Sti.
    • Track by track comparison of the Stv and Sti trackers on the real data have shown similar momentum resolution and pulls for inclusive tracks: Systematic and opposite shifts for positive and negative tracks, were observed between tracks found by the two trackers. The discrepancies are shown to grow with the transverse momenta
  • Insufficient supporting evidence were presented with regard to Stv’s ability to handle low multiplicity high pile-up events - this issue be studied in details and presented for the next review before Stv deployment
  • Physics evaluation specifics
    • Stv and StvCA have been reported to have lower efficiencies and unusual phi distributions by the UPC
    • The efficiencies of Stv and StvCA look significantly lower than those from Sti from Jetcorr correlation studies
    • The widths of Lambda and AntiLambda become broader in Stv and StvCA data samples, compared with Sti samples
    • Mass shifts were observed between the Stv and Sti tracker family
    • Spin group reported major losses in jet reconstruction efficiency (factor of 2) due to the loss of low pT tracks in Stv
    • The charge sign discrimination at high pT deteriorates significantly while switching from Sti to Stv.
    • Jetcorr tests uncovered Stv problems with saving of global tracks to MuDst format; also they report incorrect results for pT and yT correlations in Stv

Specific example of the DCA distribution problem (reminded 4/13/2012)