STAR Management Document

This tree contains STAR Management related documents.

Information for International Visitors

 Information for International Visitors


On this page you can find some guidelines and a few pointers that may help facilitate acquiring the proper documents in order to visit BNL. Please be aware that current lead times can be long to very long and you should plan your trips, whether for collaboration meetings or to take shift, accordingly.

Disclaimer: While an effort will be made to keep this information up to date, it is provided as-is. The responsibility to start the process timely, and have the required documents all available will be entirely with the application. Advise from professional legal council should always supersede any suggestions made here.


Official information from the GUV Center: More information from other sources:
What to expect when planning to visit BNL for a STAR meeting or taking shifts:
  • stay tuned ... we will update this with more specific information & feedback from other STAR international visitors.

Management Team 2014--2017

 

BES Milestones

 

 
 
Dear RHIC Spokespersons:
 
I am writing again to update my request for the beam use requests for the coming RHIC runs.
 
In consultation with the Office of Nuclear Physics we have decided to make a change to the future RHIC run schedule. Specifically, we now plan to run RHIC in both FY16 and FY17, followed by one year (FY18) without a RHIC run during which the low energy RHIC electron cooling (LEReC) system will be installed. The high statistics Beam Energy Scan II is then planned for the years FY19 and FY20. The modified plan will allow for a less aggressive schedule of the LEReC project. It will also relax the conflict between the heavy ion and spin physics programs of RHIC that remained unresolved at last year’s PAC meeting.
 
I request that you submit the annual beam use requests by May 19, 2015. The BURs should be for a 22-week RHIC run in FY16, and either a 15-week or a 22-week RHIC run in FY17.
 
I also ask the STAR Collaboration to present the iTPC proposal to the PAC and to provide an update on experimental efforts aimed at exploring possible phenomenological manifestations of the chiral magnetic effect.
 
Both collaborations should present a tentative schedule for the release of results from the data taken in runs 13 and 14 (p+p, Au+Au 15, Au+Au 200, 3He+Au).
 
Thanks, Berndt

From: Mueller, Berndt 
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:53 AM
To: Xu, Zhangbu; Morrison, David
Cc: James Nagle; Dunlop, James C; Karsch, Frithjof
Subject: performance milestones
 
Dear RHIC Collaboration spokespersons & Frithjof:
 
I received a "heads up" from Jim Sowinski that a main scientific performance milestone for nuclear physics in FY15 will be the completion of the analysis of the 15 GeV Au+Au data from Run 14 and the connection of the BES data with lattice QCD calculations. Here is the statement in more detail (Jim's words in blue):
 
“FY15:  Measure bulk properties, particle spectra, correlations and fluctuations in gold + gold collisions at Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) to search for evidence of a critical point in the Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) matter phase diagram.”
 
We recognize that significant progress has been made in finalizing and collecting the results from Beam Energy Scan I to make the case for BES II.   In evaluating this goal we will primarily be looking at producing results from the 15 GeV run carried out last year.   Other efforts that might contribute towards this measure could be results from the fixed target data taken last year and theoretical efforts such as progress towards better connecting measurements to QGP properties or extending LQCD calculations toward finite chemical potential.
 
It will be important to have tangible results to point to by the end of September 2015. To me this looks eminently doable and desirable in view of the Quark Matter 2015 conference in Kobe.
 
Let me know if you have any questions.
 

Organization

Organization Information

The following information is available about the STAR organization. Click on any of the following topics.

Policies

 

Statement of Support for Continued STAR Running post BES-II

Official letter from BNL Lab. management, Nov 2017


STAR Beamtime Requests

STAR Council information


Archived Collaboration Lists
The STAR Collaboration list of members
MEMO on Collaboration Institutional bylines (10/22/2015)

STAR Shift Plan
The STAR Collaboration shift policy (posted 11 July 2001)

 

2001 original bylaws

Revised Sections II and III 28 November 2001

 

I. Collaboration Membership

  1. Members

    Scientists, graduate students, engineers and other technically-oriented persons intending to make a significant contribution to this collaboration over a period of a least one year are eligible to be members. Members of other RHIC collaborations will not be members of this collaboration without permission from the Council.

     

  2. Institutions

    Institutions (universities or laboratories) are admitted to the Collaboration by the Council upon recommendation of the Spokesperson. Normally an institution will have at least two Ph.D.s who are eligible to be members. Each institution is responsible for its list of members and for designating a contact person who will receive and disseminate collaboration information within that institution.

     

II. Council

  1. Membership

    The Council will consist of one member from each collaborating institution who will represent the membership from that institution. Institutions are admitted to the Collaboration by the Council upon recommendation of the Spokesperson and upon receiving an affirmative vote of at least 75% of the Council. Each institution will select its representative. Institutions may also be admitted to the Collaboration without Council membership. Such an institution should be affiliated with another institution which has Council membership and may be given its own Council membership at a later time by a vote of the Council. The Spokesperson and Deputy Spokespersons will be ex-officio members of the Council. The Council may add extra members.

    Younger members of the collaboration will be represented by up to three at-large Council members with no more than five years experience beyond the Ph.D., at least one of whom should be a graduate student. Candidates for at-large positions can be either self-nominated or nominated by others after a call for nominations by the Spokesperson. The at-large representatives will be elected by those members of the collaboration with no more than five years experience beyond the Ph.D. Elections should take place at least every two years.

     

  2. Function

    The Council will deal with general issues which concern the collaboration. Examples include the organization and governance of the Collaboration, adoption of the bylaws and amendments thereto, the policy on admission of new members and institutions to the Collaboration, and publication policy. In addition, the Council is responsible for election of the Spokesperson and for approval of Deputy Spokesperson appointments.

     

  3. Governance and Meetings

    The chairperson of the Council is elected by majority vote of the Council from among its ranks. The term of office is two years, and is not renewable. At the end of the Chairperson's first year in office, a deputy is elected who will become the chairperson's successor. After the end of the chairperson's term of office, the chairperson will serve yet another year as deputy.

    Normally, Council meetings will be held during collaboration meetings. At the discretion of the Council Chair, additional meetings can be called with at least two weeks notice. Any Council member unable to attend a given meeting can name a substitute representing the same institution or group. All Council meetings will include a closed session, without the Spokesperson and Deputy Spokesperson(s) present. Elections by the Council, of the Spokesperson or Council Chair or Deputy Chair, must be announced publicly to the entire collaboration at least two weeks in advance of the meeting at which the elections will take place.

     

  4. Voting

    The Council will make decisions on all issues except elections and admission of new institutions based on a simple majority of all voting members. Any member may call for a secret ballot. Votes on adding extra members, admitting new institutions, or amending these bylaws must be announced ahead of time. Proxies to the Council chairperson are allowed for non-election votes, as are electronic meetings and ballots.

    Voting for Spokesperson will be carried out by secret ballot, and without proxies, at publicly announced Council meetings. A quorum of 60% of Council members must be represented at the meeting for a valid vote. A candidate for Spokesperson can be elected in the first round of voting only if he or she receives more than 50% of all votes cast, including abstentions. If no candidate obtains this absolute majority, runoff rounds will be conducted for the top vote-getters until one candidate obtains more than 50% of the votes cast, not counting abstentions. The re-election of a sitting Spokesperson requires a 2/3 majority of the voting representatives present at the meeting.

    Candidates for Spokesperson can be nominated by any member of the collaboration. An ad hoc nomination committee consisting of the Council Chair and two Council members appointed by the Chair will solicit nominations at least 30 days before the election, and will prepare and oversee the ballots.

     

III. Spokesperson

  1. Selection

    The Spokesperson is elected by the Council and serves at its discretion. The normal term of office is 3 years, renewable with a 2/3 majority of the voting Council representatives present at the meeting.

    The Council can decide to terminate the Spokesperson's term in office at any time and to request new elections. Such a termination requires a 3/4 vote of the representatives present at a Council meeting with a quorum of at least 2/3 of the members represented.

     

  2. Function of the Spokesperson

    The Spokesperson will be the representative of the Collaboration in scientific, technical, and managerial concerns. The Spokesperson will be concerned not only with the design and construction of the detector and its upgrades, but also with all other preparations required to operate the experiment efficiently and to publish results in a timely and responsible fashion, and with continued leadership of the Collaboration.

     

  3. Deputy Spokespersons

    There will be up to two deputy spokespersons. The spokesperson and the deputies must all belong to different institutions. The deputy spokespersons will be appointed by the Spokesperson subject to the approval of the Council. The deputy spokespersons provide support and assistance to the Spokesperson in the management of the experiment and collaboration. They may be appointed by the Spokesperson to act on his or her behalf and to represent the Collaboration.

     

IV. Adoption

These bylaws were adopted by the Council on 21 June 1991 and amended on 16 Nov. 1991, 21 April 1993, 7 Nov. 1995, and 28 Nov. 2001.

(Adapted from the SDC)

Publication Policies

Quick reference

 

Members

Affliation Representative E-mail Phone #
University of California, Los Angeles Huan Huang huang@physics.ucla.edu 310-825-9297
Valparaiso University Don Koetke, Chairperson donald.koetke@valpo.edu 219-464-5377
Yale University Jack Sandweiss sandweiss@hepmail.physics.yale.edu 203-432-3358
Brookhaven National Laboratory Jamie Dunlop dunlop@bnl.gov 631-344-7781
       

 

Charter

August 14, 1994

Goals. The publication goals of the STAR Collaboration are as follows:

  1. The speedy publication of results that the Collaboration has agreed are sound and ready for publication. Here "publication" means the announcement of results through seminars, conferences, and/or scientific journals.
  2. The avoidance of rumors and premature publication. 
  3. The equitable assignment of credit to individuals for their work.

     

Policies.

The following policies and practices have been adopted to further the above listed goals:

 

  1. Data from all parts of the STAR detector shall be available to all members of the STAR Collaboration for analysis. Furthermore, it is the responsibility of all collaborators to see that the necessary correction algorithms and correction parameters be updated and made available to the entire Collaboration in a timely manner. Any member of the Collaboration is free to analyze any part of the data.
  2. Given the overriding principle of open communication within the collaboration, collaborators should, upon request of a colleague, provide relevant code and input assumptions that would permit results to be checked and confirmed.
     
  3. Members of the Collaboration should exercise caution and good judgment when discussing experimental results with individuals outside the Collaboration before the results have been published (i.e., presented publicly in a seminar or conference or submitted for publication in a scientific journal). These results should clearly be labeled "Preliminary". When individuals outside the Collaboration are consulted for advice on the analysis or interpretation of the data, those individuals should be asked to respect the confidentiality of the data.
  4. Members of the Collaboration should not present unpublished experimental results in seminars or conferences until (a) a memo has been circulated to the Collaboration giving details of the analysis and results, and (b) a rehearsal has been held in front of several members of the Collaboration, including a Council member and, if possible, the Spokesperson. In particular circumstances the Spokesperson may waive both these requirements.

    The Spokesperson will be designated as the Talks Coordinator. He will strive to distribute speaking invitations received by the Collaboration on the basis of the suitability of the speaker to the topic and an equitable distribution of talks to individuals and institutions with appropriate consideration of regional distinctions. As an aid to this end, he will maintain a record of all talks; thus members of the Collaboration who receive personal invitations to give talks should inform the Talks Coordinator. Speakers are encouraged to deposit a copy of their transparencies in a file which will be maintained by one of the secretaries.

  5. A paper should not be submitted to a scientific journal until the above requirements have been met and (c) a not-far-from-final draft of the paper has been discussed at a general meeting, and (d) the final draft has been circulated. After the discussion of the not-far-from-final draft, an ad hoc committee may be appointed by the Spokesperson to facilitate the preparation and submission of the final draft. This committee would consist of the principal authors and one or more individuals not directly working on the analysis. It would be empowered to adjudicate disagreements on details of the paper. In addition, the Spokesperson will maintain the list of publications.
  6. The Spokesperson will maintain the Collaboration's current author list. In general, the authors of papers will be those collaborators who have contributed to the taking or analysis of the data reported in the paper. In recognition of their contributions, collaborators who have worked on the installation of new equipment but have left the Collaboration prior to the taking of data will be included on the initial papers of the Collaboration using that equipment. Normally individuals are dropped from the general author list one year after they leave the Collaboration; however, individuals who have made special contributions to a given topic, either in hardware or analysis, should be retained on the author list of papers for which their contributions are relevant. Technical papers need only list as authors those individuals who contributed to that project, but the "STAR Collaboration" should be acknowledged. Decisions on the inclusion of authors will be done on the basis of these guidelines by the Council member from the author's institution with the concurrence of the Spokesperson.

    The authors of papers will be listed in alphabetical order, preceded or followed by the phrase "STAR Collaboration". Papers which result from student's theses should be so indicated by appropriate footnotes. Papers for conference proceedings are normally submitted in the speaker's name, plus other major contributors if appropriate, plus "STAR Collaboration", and require only the Spokesperson's agreement on the wording of the text.

  7. The Spokesperson will maintain a list of students' thesis topics which will be updated at collaboration meetings. The Council may aid in resolving any conflicts.
  8. Members of the Collaboration should not issue press releases or call press conferences without the approval of the Spokesperson, who will consult with the members of the Council.

 

Physics Opportunities with STAR in 2020+

 

STAR 2016 BUR for run 17

PAC recommendation 2016

Weekly phone meeting: 
Monday 3-4PM (EDT) 
https://bluejeans.com/333205157

April 4, meeting agenda: 
Drupal Calendar

latest version of current BUR:
Version 12, 05/21/2016

Last-year's BUR and CAD projections

Lambda/Lambdabar polariation at 27GeV

Subsequent meeting with Berndt after the NSAC meeting in March 23 about 
Run17: Berndt said that after discussion with DOE and BNL management,
it is likely that 19 cryo-weeks of RHIC operation should be taken as baseline,
this should include two weeks of CeC commissioning.
That means effectively 17 cryo-weeks for run 17. 

Executive Summary: 

The STAR Collaboration makes the following two-year beam-use proposal, in order to achieve its spin and relativistic heavy ion physics goals on a timescale consistent with intense international interest and competition in these areas, as well as to utilize RHIC beams effectively, taking full advantage of recent improvements in machine and detector capability.

 

 

Run

Energy

Duration

System

Goals

priority

Sequence

17

ÖsNN=510 GeV

 

 

 

13-wk

 

 

 1-wk

 

 2-wk

Transverse
  p+p

 

  p+p

 

 CeC

AN of W±, g, Drell-Yan,
L=360 pb-1, 55% pol

 

RHICf

1

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

2

18

 ÖsNN =200 GeV

 

ÖsNN=200 GeV

 

ÖsNN=27 GeV

  3.5-wk

 

  3.5-wk

 

 2-wk

Ru+Ru

 

Zr+Zr

 

Au+Au

1.2billion MB

 

1.2billion MB

 

500M MB

2

 

      2

 

      3

4

 

3

 

5

Table  STYLEREF 1 \s 1 SEQ Table \* ARABIC \s 1 1: Scenario I: 19 cryoweeks for Run 17 and 13 cryo-weeks for run 18. We assume most of the TPC bandwidth (1800Hz) is for the minbias event rate for isobar data-taking with 90 hours per week of DAQ time. All luminosities requested are actual sampled luminosity. See text for details of HFT and pp510 run conditions and optimizations.

 

STAR’s highest scientific priority is the first significant measurement of the sign change of the Sivers’ function, when compared to the value measured in SIDIS, and evolution effects in transverse momentum distributions through measurements of single spin asymmetries in W+/-, Z, direct photon and Drell-Yan production in transversely polarized √s = 500 GeV p+p collisions. The sign change measurement is a fundamental test of QCD and is being pursued by other experiments, making a timely measurement imperative.

 

STAR’s second scientific priority is to clarify the interpretation of the observed signatures of the chiral magnetic effect, chiral magnetic wave and chiral vortical effect by making measurements that disentangle signal from background v2 effects.  We request a 3.5 week run each for Ruthenium-96 (Ru+Ru) and Zirconium-96 (Zr+Zr) collisions in run 18.  This choice of nuclei is ideal as it allows for a variation in magnetic field at a maximum of 10%, while keeping nearly all other parameters the same. This decisive measurement of the ratio of charge separation in the isobar reduces the flow background dramatically, and will greatly advance our understanding of the chiral magnetic effect, which has fundamental impact beyond the field of high-temperature QCD.

 

 

Run

Energy

Duration

System

Goals

priority

Sequence

17

ÖsNN=510 GeV

 

 

 

 

 

 

ÖsNN=62.4 GeV

13-wk

 

 

 1-wk

 

 2-wk

 

 4-wk

Transverse
  p+p

 

  p+p

 

 CeC

 

Au+Au

AN of W±, g, Drell-Yan,
L=360 pb-1, 55% pol

 

RHICf

 

 

 

Jets, dileptons, NPE

1.5B MB

1

 

 

4

 

 

 

     5

1

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

18

 ÖsNN =200 GeV

 

ÖsNN=200 GeV

 

ÖsNN=27 GeV

  3.5-wk

 

  3.5-wk

 

 2-wk

Ru+Ru

 

Zr+Zr

 

Au+Au

1.2billion MB

 

1.2billion MB

 

500M MB

2

 

      2

 

      5

5

 

4

 

6

Table  STYLEREF 1 \s 1 SEQ Table \* ARABIC \s 1 2: Scenario 2: 24 cryoweeks for Run 17 and 13 cryo-weeks for run18

 

 

Our next scientific priority is to take data at beam energies that are lower than the nominal energies, but are not part of STAR’s proposed Beam-Energy-Scan Phase-II program. There are two programs in our requests in this category:

a)     Au+Au collisions at 62 GeV for measurements of inclusive jets and charm spectrum at low energy. With newly developed analysis techniques, inclusive jet measurements are possible with minimum-bias data in Au+Au collisions. We have recently extended the measurement to Au+Au at 62 GeV with limited statistics from run 10. We request 4 weeks of Au+Au collisions at this energy for an inclusive jet RCP measurement. This will also provide a measurement of Non-photonic electrons from charm semileptonic decays. In addition, with the significant reduction of material from run 16 to run 17 and run 18, dilepton measurements with good statistics are possible in 4 weeks of data-taking.

b)     STAR has observed an exciting new effect, the global polarization of hyperons in noncentral Au+Au collisions. Theorists are excited and BES-II (2019-2020) will provide opportunities for higher precision explorations of the effect. There is also a possibility of observing a difference in Lambda and anti-Lambda polarization if the global polarization effect connected to the Chiral magnetic effect. We propose to extract important information from this effect at beam energy above the nominal BES-II energies through a high-statistics dataset at 27 GeV. It will be even better if we are able to collect this dataset in run17 with sufficient beam time, which allows us to analyze the effect with high statistics and guide our future direction in this subject ahead of the BES-II program.  

 

The STAR Collaboration presents in this BUR five compelling and prioritized scientific programs for the 2017 and 2018 RHIC runs, prior to the start of BES-II [[i]]. In this BUR we furthermore discuss the highlights from the scientific publications, on-going analyses and detector performance from recent runs. We also outline the planned upgrades in the next few years in preparation for Run 17 and the Beam Energy Scan II.


[i] STAR Beam Energy Scan II: Studying the Phase Diagram of QCD Matter at RHIC

   https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/starnotes/public/sn0598

Highlights from the recent results

 
1) Spin publications and analyses from run15 

2) HFT preliminary results and other open charm results (Xin Dong and Zhenyu et al.) 

3) MTD preliminary and other quarkonium results (Lijuan et al.))

4) chiral magnetic effect (Paul and Gang) 

5) Lambda Global Polarization (Mike) 

Anything else? 

HFT preliminary results and projection

2016/05/10 v3: text updated 
2016/05/07 v2: edited section 2 "Run16 Performance and Projection" .
2016/05/04 v1: edited section 1.1 "Progress on physics analyses with the HFT", put section 2 "Run16 Performance and Projection" as a space holder for now. 
 

MTD section 2.5: Progress on results and status with the MTD

on May 24, add one para in Section 4.8 for MTD in run17.

Update on May 16th:
seperate run 16 performance and projection from section 2.5.

on May 6.
1)  include recent results and status in the current write up.
2) for another section 3.1 under Run 16 performance report: The HFT and MTD data performance and projections,
there is not much to say for the MTD. Information in terms of sampled luminosity is included in Section 2.5.

PAC talks

 PAC talks: 

1) run14/15 experimental results and status (Frank) 

2) BUR (Zhangbu)

3) BES-II and iTPC upgrade (Helen+Flemming)

It will be good if we can have a preview of the RHICf (Sako, Itaru), Spin (Carl) and CME (Paul) talks.

computing and calibration

 Producing the requested data for physics will involve significant use of data stores, considerable processing time, and time spent understanding and completing calibrations. When a dataset is a continuation of a collision species and energy from a previous year (with STAR's detector similarly set up), first-physics calibrations for the highest priority dataset typically require on the order of two months after the conclusion of data-taking for that year. Subsequent dataset calibrations for a given year need another month each. The proposed 500 GeV p+p and 27 GeV (and potentially 62 GeV) Au+Au datasets will be such continuations, adding to what were acquired in 2013 and 2011 (2010) respectively (repeating the environment of no HFT and no iTPC). Understanding features of new running conditions could extend calibrations of the isotope datasets to take a few months more, and it is important to keep in mind that unforeseen peculiarities of any given data set can further delay delivery. 


Table X presents estimates of the DAQ and data summary ("MuDst") dataset sizes of the proposed colliding species, along with projected single-pass production times on 100% of STAR's 2016 allocation of the RACF computing farm. It is critical to emphasize that these numbers are tied to the proposed event goals, and would scale with the actual events acquired. These productions will need to balance computing resource usage with prior-year datasets as well as ongoing calibrations and run support. STAR may choose, as an imaginable example, to produce Run 16 200 GeV Au+Au concurrently with the Run 17 500 GeV p+p in a 60%-40% apportionment, which would elongate the latter production to a year or more.

For the 500 GeV pp dataset, we expect 360 pb^-1 to require approximately 3.3 billion events recorded for processing. 

Data set                        Events  DAQ size [PB]   MuDst size [PB] Production time [months]
500 GeV p+p             3.3B            3.20                    1.75                            5.0
62 GeV Au+Au    1.5B            0.81                    0.54                            1.0
27 GeV Au+Au    0.5B            0.24                    0.12                            0.5
200 GeV Ru+Ru   1.2B            0.88                    0.65                            1.0
200 GeV Zr+Zr   1.2B            0.88                    0.65                            1.0
Totals                                  6.01                    3.71

Caption: Table X: Computing resource estimates for production of the proposed Runs 17 and 18 datasets (see text for details)

 

run 17 pp510 BUR

 
similar to last BUR with updates from Spin Plan and also detector 

section structure same as last BUR

run17 (24 cryo-weeks) Au+Au 62 GeV

 
proposal and Projection for 62GeV (Helen et al.)

run18 (maybe 17 or later) 27GeV for Lambda/Lambdabar Global Polarization

 proposal and projection for 2 weeks of 27GeV Au+Au 

run18 isobar (3+3 weeks)

 
proposal and projects for Isobar (Zr+Zr and Ru+Ru) 
3+3 weeks

Discuss possible Isobar BES? 

The isobar (CME search) part of the BUR has been prepared by Gang, Paul and Sergei:
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/rexwg/service/BUR1718/CME.pdf

The tex and eps files are in the same directory,
while the pdf file is also attached below.

STAR run 15-16 BUR

Final PAC Report in 2014:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/PAC_report_2014.pdf (07/07/2014)

new RHIC luminosity projection: 
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/2014-0921%20RHIC%20collider%20projections.pdf 

Draft version:

Final version:
STAR_BUR_Run1516_v18.pdf(06/02/2014) 

draft talk:
STAR_BUR_PAC_2014_xzb_final.pptx
(06/09/2014) 
STAR_BUR_PAC_2014_xzb_v0.pptx
(06/06/2014) 

BES II draft talk at PAC2014
 

STAR_BUR_Run1516.v9.pdf (05/28/2014)
 

STAR_BUR_Run1516.v8.pdf (05/27/2014)
 

STAR_BUR_Run1516.v6.docx(05/25/2014) 

STAR_BUR_Run1516.v1.docx (04/23/2014)

<<<<<<<<<<<

The next Nuclear and Particle Physics Program Advisory Committee meeting will be held at Brookhaven 11-13 June 2014. 
The deadline for the submission of written material to be considered at this meeting is 3 June 2014.
PAC Meeting agenda, Jun 11--13, 2014

previous BUR and presentations at last PAC meeting

PAC meeting agenda, 2013
 

 

Committee meeting:
SeeVogh ID: 100 4272 
Every Thursday effective 04/03/2014 from 3-4PM

Title:                     run15-16BUR
Description:       
Community:        STAR
 Meeting type: Open Meeting (Round Table)
 
 Meeting Access Information:
 SeeVoghRN Application       http://research.seevogh.com/joinSRN?meeting=MtM8Ma2B2eDlDa9l9IDs9t
 WebStart (Java)             http://research.seevogh.com/join?meeting=MtM8Ma2B2eDlDa9l9IDs9t
 Mobile App : Meeting ID: 100 4274  
or Link: http://research.seevogh.com/join?meeting=MtM8Ma2B2eDlDa9l9IDs9t
 
 - Phone Bridge
                ID: 100 4274

Template for the word document style:
http://www.star.bnl.gov/~eca/BUR1516/STAR_BUR_Run1516.v0.docx 

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Charge to the committee:

The committee is requested to provide a document on Beam Use Request for RHIC run 15 and run 16 with the planned guideline of 22 cryo-weeks for both runs. In last BUR, STAR presented a request for run15 with 5 weeks of p+Au and 12 weeks of p+p physics runs, and a multi-year three-stage run plan for heavy-flavor program. Progresses in scientific results, detector developments and installations relevant to the programs in BUR should be documented. An initial draft of BUR should be available in May 10 for collaboration review, and a final version should be submitted to PAC in June 3.

The committee consists of: Elke Aschenauer, Ernst Sichtermann, Huan Huang, Helen Caines, Dan Cebra,

Jerome Lauret, Flemming Videbaek, Xin Dong, Daniel Kikola, Lijuan Ruan, Frank Geurts,

Zhangbu Xu (chair)

-----Original Message-----

charge from ALD

From: Mueller, Berndt

Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:39 PM

To: James Nagle; Morrison, David; Xu, Zhangbu; Nu Xu

Cc: Yamin, Peter; Lissauer, David; Dunlop, James C; Roser, Thomas

Subject: 2014 RHIC Beam Use Requests

Dear RHIC Collaborations:

In view of the proximity of Quark Matter 2014 to the PAC meeting on June 11-13, the final version of the annual beam use proposals from the RHIC collaborations will be due on June 3, 2014. In view of the closeness of this date to the PAC meeting, and to leave the PAC members sufficient time to study the beam use requests, I urge you to not exceed this deadline. In order to permit Laboratory feedback before the proposals are finalized, I request that you send me a draft version of the beam use proposal no later than May 12, before everyone leaves for Quark Matter.

The proposals should describe and justify which beam operations you would like to see during the 2015 and 2016 runs, which are currently planned as 22 week runs. As usual, the beam use proposal should also give a brief review of recent published results and an early assessment of the success of Run-14.

Please send the proposals in electronic form to Peter Yamin, with copies to me, David Lissauer, Jamie Dunlop, and Thomas Roser.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation in this important matter.

Best regards

Berndt

Executive Summary

 

With two new major upgrades, the Heavy-flavor Tracker (HFT) and the Muon Telescope Detector (MTD), STAR Collaboration has positioned us well for leading the field in several major scientific programs in the next few years. We have maintained a similar pace in our scientific productivity and training of the next generation of young scientists for the last 15 years. To continue our excellent track record on science, we, the members of the STAR Collaboration, have recently produced a road map for our future in the form of our decadal plan, eSTAR Letter of Intent, Beam Energy Scan Phase II Whitepaper and are in the process of producing pp/pA document. This is a critical time for RHIC as a facility and STAR as a collaboration. STAR Collaboration is fully committed to our priorities based on the scientific pillars of studying QGP properties, quantifying nucleon spin structure, searching for critical point in QCD phase diagram and exploring the high-density gluon field in nuclei. A sustainable strong science program in STAR calls for realization of the proposed upgrades and substantial new initiatives, and require continuous effort and involvement from each and every collaborator. The STAR Collaboration proposes the following two-year beam-use request for RHIC run periods in year of 2015 and 2016, in order to achieve its near-term spin and relativistic heavy ion physics goals. A detailed breakdown of the proposed run periods is shown in Table.1.1.

Run 15:

 
The on-going run14 with Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV has been producing the first dataset with complete MTD and PIXEL/IST subdetectors of HFT. We have proposed a few incremental upgrades to the detectors, which are crucial components for a successful run15 scientific program. The necessary upgrades to the detectors are: refurbishing Forward Meson Spectrometer (FMS), a scintillator-based pre-shower detector in front of FMS, and Roman Pot Phase II*. These upgrades are anticipated to be ready for the run. The proposed run15 programs with p+p and p+Au collisions at Ös=200GeV provide crucial baseline measurements of charmed mesons and quarkonia. The same beam species will produce several important measurements to study the ridge phenomenon and onset of gluon saturation effect using the unique polarized p+Au collisions in a collider mode. 
 
A six-week run of p+p collisions at Ös=200GeV with longitudinal polarization will provide a data-set to further constrain the gluon polarization through inclusive jet and di-jet measurements at mid-rapidity, especially for large momentum fractions x, and constitutes the main spin physics objective for Run 15 longitudinal running. The non-zero gluon contributions to the spin structure of nucleon from double-longitudinal polarization measurement of dijet production have generated significant interests in further improving the measurements and its kinematic reach. The same run configuration also allows measures on ALL of p0 in the forward meson spectrometer to reach significantly lower x kinematics.
 
We propose a subsequent six-week run of p+p collisions at Ös=200GeV with spins transverse to their momentum direction. These p+p collisions exhibit kinematic and dynamical effects that are directly sensitive to quark transversity and partonic motion within the proton. In addition to improving the existing measurements of IFF and Collins analyses, a refurbished FMS with additional pre-shower in the front will provide clean direct photon measurements in the forward rapidity. This program is complemented by studies of polarized p+p elastic scattering and central exclusive production, in which a far-forward proton is detected intact. The relocation of the Roman Pots allows concurrent data-taking with nominal beam configuration, and enables new measurements on AN for exclusive J/Ψ production and inclusive diffractive production in p+p collisions.
 
A new program with five-week run with an integrated 300 nb-1 luminosity of ÖsNN = 200 GeV p+Au collisions with transversely polarized proton beam is proposed to follow the 12-weeks of p+p collisions. The program will address important physics, such as gluon saturation, cold nuclear effects on open heavy flavor and heavy quarkonia production, the ridge effect in pA, the Cronin effect and the strangeness enhancement in small-size systems. Utilizing RHIC’s unique capability of polarizing the proton projectile beam on heavy nuclei, the ratio of single spin asymmetries in π0 and direct photon production at forward rapidity between p+A and p+p collisions can be used to provide access to the elusive nuclear Weizsaecker-Williams (WW) gluon distribution function. The asymmetry for exclusive J/Ψ production in ultra-peripheral p+A collisions measurable with the upgraded Roman-Pot detectors in STAR will explore the generalized parton distribution function E for gluons.
 
Run16:
 
We propose a 10-week run of Au+Au collisions at at Ö`sNN = 200 GeV, integrating 10nb-1 of luminosity with rare triggers for Upsilon states, gamma-jet correlation, Bà J/y and J/y production, and 2 billion minbias events for Lc and differential study of charm flow and correlations.

A total integrated luminosity of 20nb-1 with the combination of run14 and run16 provides the necessary statistics for a measurement of three Upsilon states. We also request to collect 2 billion minimum-bias Au+Au collision events at Ö`sNN = 200 GeV in Run16. The effective figure of merit in terms of statistics for the signal increases by about a factor of 6 for low pT D0 in comparison to similar dataset taken in run14, t. This significant improvement will allow us to perform differential studies on the charmed hadron yields, flow and correlation in several centralities. More importantly, the high statistics and the improved pointing resolution for low momentum tracks will make the Lc measurement feasible (ct of Lc ~ 60 mm).

 
A 7-week run of transversely polarized p+p collisions at Ö`sNN = 510 GeV with integrated luminosity of 700 pb-1 is proposed for AN fo W± at mid-rapidity, g and exploratory DY measurements at forward rapidity. The possibility of measuring AN for DY, W+/-, Z0 Bosons and direct photons in one experiment would provide a unique world-class capability to test TMD evolution, access the Sivers function for sea quarks and test the prediction of non-universality for the Sivers function through three different processes to distinguish different underlying mechanisms.
 

section 1: Highlights from STAR Science Programs

section 2: run14 Performance Report

15 GeV Au+Au

200 GeV Au+Au

section 3: run15 BUR request on p+p and p+A collisions

Twelve weeks:

√s = 200 GeV polarized p+p collisions, corresponding to 90 pb-1

integrated luminosity and 60% polarization
√sNN = 200 GeV p↑+Au collisions to collect 300 nb-1.

Five weeks:

The run will be split in half between running with transverse and longitudinal polarization.

Update necessary information since last BUR

section 4: run16 Request

HFT request for Run15/16  (draft April 16, 2014)
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/heavy/dongx/presentation/BUR_15_16_HFT_04152014.pdf

Talk at DIS on transverse W/Z results and projection:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Fazio_DIS2014_STAR_W_v2.pptx

section 5: Detector and Upgrades relevant to BUR


2014 R&D and Upgrades:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/future/star-rd-and-upgrades-2014

HFT (aasume we will have new TDC for vertex cut, and Aluminum cables for PIXEL)
MTD
HLT
Offline
FMS+preshower (run15)
Roman Pots
HCAL (run16)

STAR run16-17 BUR

PAC Recommendation report in 2016

PAC Recommendation report in 2015

Latest version (v18) of BUR for run16 and run17

2015 PAC meeting agenda: https://indico.bnl.gov/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=1138

Last year's BUR available at: 
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/star-run-15-16-bur 

new CAD projection:
CAD Projection in 01/06/2017
CAD Projection in 04/19/2015

We don't have the official projections from CAD yet for this year, but last year's is available: 
CAD Luminosity Project (2014)
For other species not listed in the document, a rule-of-thumb is to assume that parton luminosity 
is the same: A+B luminosity is Lum_pp/(A*B). 

Weekly Meeting (Friday 2-3PM) Title:

STAR Run 16-17 BUR

To join or start the meeting in BlueJean, go to:

https://bluejeans.com/708164902/2570?g=ojtgc5dfnvuua4dbfz2ww6jomvshk===

Meeting ID: 708164902

Just want to dial in? (http://bluejeans.com/numbers)

1) +1 408 740 7256

    +1 888 240 2560 (US Toll Free)

    +1 408 317 9253 (Alternate Number)

<<<<<<<<<<<<charges <<<<<<<<<
Dear STAR Collaborators:

I am writing to announce the formation of the Run 16-17 Beam Use Request Committee. The committee is charged with providing a BUR document for RHIC run 16 and run 17 with the planned guideline of 22 cryo-weeks for run 16, and two possible options of 15 and 22 cryo-weeks for run17.

In the last BUR, STAR presented a request for run16 with 10 weeks of Au+Au at 200GeV and 7 weeks of p+p at 510GeV, envisioning a shut-down in run17 for preparation of BES II in run 18 and run 19. The current plan calls for an additional run17 with a BES II program in run 19 and run 20. Progresses in scientific results, detector developments and installations relevant to the programs in BUR should be documented. An initial draft of BUR should be available in May 10 for collaboration review, and a final version should be submitted to PAC in May 19.

The committee members are: Elke Aschenauer, Helen Caines, Dan Cebra, Xin Dong, Jim Drachenberg, Renee Fatemi (co-chair), Frank Geurts, Daniel Kikola, Flemming Videbaek, Lijuan Ruan, Alex Schmah, Ernst Sichtermann, Fuqiang Wang, Gang Wang, Nu Xu, Zhangbu Xu (co-chair).  

Progress and updates will be available at:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/public/smd/star-bur-run16-17. 

Thanks!
Zhangbu Xu

-----Original Message-----

From: Mueller, Berndt

Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:58 PM

To: James Nagle; Morrison, David; Xu, Zhangbu; Ernst Sichtermann

Cc: Roser, Thomas; Fischer, Wolfram; Dunlop, James C

Subject: BURs for Run 16 & 17

 

Dear RHIC Spokespersons:

 

I am writing again to update my request for the beam use requests for the coming RHIC runs.

 

In consultation with the Office of Nuclear Physics we have decided to make a change to the future RHIC run schedule. Specifically, we now plan to run RHIC in both FY16 and FY17, followed by one year (FY18) without a RHIC run during which the low energy RHIC electron cooling (LEReC) system will be installed. The high statistics Beam Energy Scan II is then planned for the years FY19 and FY20. The modified plan will allow for a less aggressive schedule of the LEReC project. It will also relax the conflict between the heavy ion and spin physics programs of RHIC that remained unresolved at last year’s PAC meeting.

 

I request that you submit the annual beam use requests by May 19, 2015. The BURs should be for a 22-week RHIC run in FY16, and either a 15-week or a 22-week RHIC run in FY17.

 

I also ask the STAR Collaboration to present the iTPC proposal to the PAC and to provide an update on experimental efforts aimed at exploring possible phenomenological manifestations of the chiral magnetic effect.

 

Both collaborations should present a tentative schedule for the release of results from the data taken in runs 13 and 14 (p+p, Au+Au 15, Au+Au 200, 3He+Au).

 

Thanks, Berndt

Au+Au 200GeV

Last BUR under the assumption of 22 cryo-weeks for Au+Au 200 and pp510. 

run period of Au+Au collisions at at √sNN = 200 GeV, integrating 10 nb-1 of luminosity with rare triggers for Upsilon states, gamma-jet correlations, B->J/ψ and J/ψ production, and 2 billion minbias events for Λc and differential studies of charm flow and correlations. A total integrated luminosity of over 20nb-1 with the combination of run14 and run16 provides the necessary statistics for a measurement of each of the three Upsilon states. We also request to collect 2 billion minimum-bias Au+Au collision events at √sNN = 200 GeV in Run16. A new set of the inner HFT (PXL layers) with Aluminum cables will be installed for run16 with significantly reduced multiple-scattering. We have also proposed to improve the effectiveness of online vertex selection of collisions within the HFT fiducial coverage. The effective figure of merit in terms of statistics for the signal increases by about a factor of 6 for low pT D0 in comparison to the dataset taken in run14 due to reduced cabling material and improved online vertex selection. This significant improvement will allow us to perform differential studies on the charmed hadron yields, flow and correlations in several centralities. More importantly, the high statistics and the improved pointing resolution for low momentum tracks will make the Λc measurement feasible (cτ of Λc ~ 60 μm).

The file discussion issues on the HI running for run-16 is attached in this page.
FV

B->J/Psi projection

Comparison of B->e, B -> D and B->J/psi decay kinematics:

slide 5 in https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/1105BMeson_PythiaStuday_BNL_Guannan.pdf by Xin Doing and Guannan Xie

Projectios for B->J/psi RAA

Projections for B->J/psi RAA for BUR16/17 by  Bingchu Huang
Projections for B->J/psi RAA for BUR16/17 with separated uncertainties from Au+Au and p+p baseline by Bingchu Huang




 

 

Projectios for B->J/psi RCP:

R_CP (0-10%/ 40-60%)

R_CP (0-10%/ 60-80%)

BUR15 Executive Summary

The STAR Collaboration makes the following two-year beam-use proposal, in order to achieve its spin and relativistic heavy ion physics goals on a timescale consistent with intense international interest and competition in these areas, as well as to utilize RHIC beams effectively, taking full advantage of recent improvements in machine and detector capability.

Run
Energy
Duration
System
Goals
priority
Sequence
16
ÖsNN=200 GeV
 
 
ÖsNN=62 GeV
 
ÖsNN=19.6 GeV
 
13-wk
 
 
4-wk
 
 1-wk
Au+Au
 
 
Au+Au
 
d+Au
Lc, D v2, RAA, ϒ RAA
10nb-1, 2billion MB
 
   1.2B MB, HT
 
   100M MB
1
 
 
4
 
4
1
 
 
2
 
3
17
Ös = 510 GeV
 
 
ÖsNN=19.6  GeV
 
ÖsNN =200 GeV
 
ÖsNN=200 GeV
11 wk
 
 
 1-wk
 
  3-wk
 
  3-wk
Transverse
  p+p
 
p+p
 
Ru+Ru
 
Zr+Zr
 
AN of W±, g, Drell-Yan,
L=400 pb-1, 55% pol
 
400M MB
 
1.2billion MB
 
1.2billion MB
2
 
 
4
 
3
 
3
1
 
 
2
 
3
 
4

Table 1 1: Scenario I-A: 22 cryoweeks for Run 17 with Isobar sources (Zr, Ru)

STAR’s top priority is to capitalize on the successful installation and operation of the Heavy Flavor Tracker (HFT) and Muon Telescope Detector (MTD) in runs 14 and 15. We request 13 weeks of Au+Au collsions at √s = 200 GeV to collect rare triggers for Upsilon states, gamma-jet correlations, B-->J/Psi and J/Psi production, as well as 2 billion minbias events for Lambda_c and differential studies of charm flow and correlations. The combination of the run 14 and run 16 will allow for measurements of each of the three Upsilon states. The heavy flavor and quarkonium program must be completed to fulfill STAR’s scientific program with the newly HFT and MTD upgrades before BES-II.

STAR’s second priority is to make the first significant measurement of the Sivers sign change and non-perturbative evolution effects in transverse momentum distributions via reconstruction of W+-, Z, direct photon and Drell-Yan single spin asymmetries in transversely polarized √s = 500 GeV p+p collisions. The sign change measurement is a fundamental test of QCD and is being pursued by other experiments, making a timely measurement imperative.

STAR’s third priority is to clarify the interpretation of the observed signatures of the chiral magnetic, wave and vortical effect by making measurements that disentangle signal from background v2 effects. We request a 3 week run each for Ruthinuium (Ru+Ru) and Zirconium (Zr+Zr) collisions. This choice of nuclei is ideal as it allows for a variation in magnetic field at a maximum of 10%, while keeping nearly all other parameters the same. This decisive measurement of the ratio of charge separation in the isobar while reducing the flow background to minimum will greatly advance our understanding of the chiral magnetic effect and has fundamental impact beyond the field of high-temperature QCD.  

Run
Energy
Duration
System
Goals
priority
Sequence
16
ÖsNN=200 GeV
 
 
ÖsNN=62 GeV
 
13-wk
 
 
5-wk
Au+Au
 
 
Au+Au
Lc, D v2, RAA, ϒ RAA
10nb-1, 2billion MB
 
1.2B MB, HT
1
 
 
4
1
 
 
2
17
ÖsNN=510 GeV
 
 
ÖsNN = 14.5
 
ÖsNN = 19.6
 
ÖsNN = 39.0
 
 Ös= 19.6
 
12-wk
 
 
1-wk
 
1-wk
 
1-wk
 
   1-wk
Transverse
p+p
 
d+Au
 
d+Au
 
d+Au
 
     p+p
AN of W±, g, Drell-Yan,
L=400 pb-1, 55% pol
 
80M MB
 
100M MB
 
400M MB
 
           400M MB
1
 
 
4
 
4
 
4
 
4
1
 
 
5
 
4
 
3
 
2

Table 1 2: Scenario I-B: 22 cryoweeks for Run 17 for the case where the Ru-96 source cannot be procured. 

Our next priority is to take data at lower beam energies. There are two programs in our requests in this category:
a) Au+Au collisions at 62 GeV for measurements of inclusive jets and charm spectrum at low energy.
With newly developed analysis techniques, an inclusive jet measurement is possible with minimum-bias data in Au+Au collisions. We have recently extended the measurement to Au+Au at 62GeV with limited statistics from run 10. We request 4 (5) weeks of Au+Au collisions at this energy for an inclusive jet RCP measurement. This will also provide a measurement of D0 spectrum from HFT.
b) d+Au and p+p collisions at low energies for study of onset of high-pt hadron nuclear modification due to jet quenching.
STAR has produced a systematic measurement of RCP of inclusive hadrons as a function of momentum from all the beam energies taken at RHIC. The data has shown a systematic increase of RCP from less than unity to significantly above unity when the beam energy varies from top energy of 200 GeV to 7.7 GeV. A combination of d+Au collisions and p+p collisions at energies where RCP is around unity will help us address the onset of final-state hadron suppression.

Run
Energy
Duration
System
Goals
priority
Sequence
16
ÖsNN=200 GeV
 
 
ÖsNN=62 GeV
 
ÖsNN=19.6 GeV
 
13-wk
 
 
4-wk
 
  1-wk
Au+Au
 
 
Au+Au
 
d+Au
Lc, D v2, RAA, ϒ RAA
10nb-1, 2billion MB
 
1.2B MB, HT
 
100M MB
1
 
 
4
 
4
1
 
 
2
 
3
17
Ös=510 GeV
 
ÖsNN=19.6 GeV
11-wk
 
 1-wk
 
Transverse
p+p
p+p
AN of W±, g, Drell-Yan,
L=400 pb-1, 55% pol
400M MB
2
 
4
2
 
1

Table 1 3: Scenario II: 15 cryoweeks for Run 17 (assume Isobar sources not possible in run16)

In this beam use request the STAR Collaboration presents five compelling scientific programs for the upcoming RHIC runs 16 and 17. We discuss the highlights from the scientific publications, on-going analyses and detector performance from recent runs. We have also outlined the planned upgrades in the next few years in preparation for the Beam Energy Scan II.

Chiral Magnetic Effect theory and data projections

Hi, Zhangbu and all

I've received the magnetic field calculation results for isobar collisions from the theorists, http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/rexwg/flow/Parity/CuAu/By_cent.pdf

and I made a projection of our measurements.
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/rexwg/flow/Parity/CuAu/PlotIsobar.gif

If we have 250M minbias events in each case, there will be a sweet zone of 20-50% centrality,
where the difference between Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr is a 3 sigma effect (combining centralities).

Gang Wang
Department of Physics & Astronomy UCLA

BUR writeup:
summary of the experimental study on chiral magnetic effect

Highlights and Accomplishments since last BUR

 

BES (14.5GeV)

  

-----Original Message-----
From: Nu Xu [mailto:nxu@lbl.gov]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 5:26 AM
To: Xu, Zhangbu
Cc: Xu Nu; Alexander Schmah; Cebra Dan; Kikola Daniel; Aschenauer, Elke; Sichtermann Ernst P; Videbaek, Flemming; Geurts Frank; Fuqiang Wang; Wang Gang; Caines Helen; Drachenberg Jim; Ruan, Lijuan; Fatemi Renee; Dong Xin
Subject: Re: BUR16 committee meeting Firday 2-3PM

 

Hi Zhangbu and All,

 

Below is the list of analysis topics (and presentations) from14.5GeV Au+Au collisions. I have divided those topics into four groups, according to their phsics relevance. Roughly, about 50% of these topics are close to the end the analysis phase, however, almost all of them are awating for the results of the 14.5 GeV embedding.

 

As many of you know that we will have our first discussion (via BlueJeans) on the 14.5GeV data analysis status next Monday, April 20th. After the meeting, we plan to prepare for a summary including the “status/problem/plan for presentation and paper” for all topics. 

 

Status of the14.5GeV data analysis

 

I. v1, v2, …vn:

(1) Paul S  - Charged particle v_n

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/sorensen_14.5GeV_update.pdf

(2) Yadav  -  v1 for p, pbar,  pi+/-,  K+/- http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/ypandit/KaonPaper/BulkCorr/Kaonv1Paper_Update.pdf

(3) Shusu  - identified particle v2:

http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/sss/14.5_flow/14.5_v2_BES_dis.pdf

 

II. Spectra and RCP:

(1) Yu Ning and Rihan – Light nuclei production http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/lfspectra/yuning/BES/pwg/B2-15-20150420.pdf

(2) Stephen Horvat and Daniel Brandenburg - R_cp http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/lfspectra/jdb/run14/AuAu15/pidRcp/pidRcp_Update_April_10_lfs.pdf

(3) Spectra of pion, Kaon, Proton, K0, L, Xi, Omega from 14.5 GeV Au+Au collisions ??? (no responses yet from co-conveners)

 

III. High moments:

(1) Xiaofeng Luo and Jochen Thaeder  - net-charge/net-proton moments http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/luoxf/PWG_discussion/Moments_14.5GeV_20150408.pdf

(2) Ji Xu  - High moments net kaons

http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/xuj/bulk/JiXu_netK_moments_Version2.pdf

 

IV: Chiral effects:

(1) Gang Wang  -  CME/CMW:

http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/rexwg/flow/Parity/BES/14.5GeV_04082015.pdf

 

 

Best regards,

 

Nu Xu

Progress on production with the Muon Telescope

 http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/lfspectra/ruanlj/MTD/STAR_BUR1617_MTD_ProductionStatusRun1415.pdf

Low Energy Reference datasets

Au+Au62 ( I think PHENIX is proposing He3+Au for run16 at various energies)
Daniel, Alex and Helen on jets and HF 
Do we need pp reference or all out for Au+Au


p+A 

Helen, Cebra and Alex on R_PA, flow (lower energies)?  
Elke on Spin 

dielectron: 
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/yiguo/error-projection-196-dau-die-spectra 

Luminosity projections and Discussions

  new CAD projection:
CAD Projection in 04/17/2015

 

NPE in Au+Au 62.4 GeV - current results and prospects for run 16

 

NPE spectra and v2 results from Au+Au 62.4 GeV run 2010

Slides 18 - 21 in Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from STAR (RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 2014)

Prospects for NPE meausrements in Au+Au 62.4 GeV in run 16

(based on inputs from Mustafa Mustafa and James Dunlop)

Attached are ratio plots from theory calculations. The total charm cross-section is down by a factor of 4-5. However the pT dependence is not trivial.

The pT of charm quarks is, consequentially, harder at 200 GeV. For R_cp measurement it means a factor of 15-20 drop in cross-section in the interesting pT region (4-10 GeV/c).
For NPE v2 the harder spectra at 200 GeV implies that the NPE cross-section is down by a factor of 10 at low electron pT due to the feed down from higher pT.

Regarding the background, the NPE background is down by only a factor of 2 (with some pT dependence) from 200 to 62GeV.

Taking the projections for top energy of min/max = 2.2 nb^-1/ 3.6 nb^-1  /week (take the middle, say 3 nb^-1) at 200 GeV, then scaling down by E^2, would expect
~1.5 nb^-1 in such a run, delivered.  Take 70% live, ~1 nb^-1.

So a factor of 5 or so possible vs. what was triggered in Run 10, also perhaps somewhat better with a narrower vertex distribution.
Not clear whether that pushes us over the top to make the HT trigger useful. It is unlikely, especially with the worse NPE S:B with the HFT.

Raw inclusive electron spectrum from Run 10 data:

Charm cross section in p+p 200 GeV vs p+p 62.4 GeV



Run16 and AuAu62 GeV estimate

I had one presentation in the last Nov collaboration meeting talking about the Run16 and some quick estimate on the D0 v2 from 5 weeks of AuAu62 GeV

Au+Au62 estimate from HFT

comments and feedbacks

 -----Original Message-----

From: Sorensen, Paul
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 1:31 AM
To: Xu, Zhangbu
Subject: Re: [Starpapers-l] STAR Beam Use Request for run 16 and 17 (ready for collaboration feedback)

 

I believe there is an error in table 5-2. Isn’t CME supposed to be larger > in Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr? It’s listed as smaller < now.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Gagliardi [mailto:c-gagliardi@tamu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 4:05 PM
To: Xu, Zhangbu
Cc: rfatemi@pa.uky.edu; Aschenauer, Elke; 'Carl Gagliardi'
Subject: RE: [Starpapers-l] STAR Beam Use Request for run 16 and 17 (ready for collaboration feedback)

 

Hi Zhangbu (cc Renee and Elke):

 

I've made it through Sections 1-3 of the Version 12 draft BUR.  I systematically tried to ignore minor typos, etc., that the PAC members should be able to read over easily.  With that "constraint", I only have a few comments or suggestions so far:

 

--  General remark:  The "Highlights" section is written in a very brief style.  That's a good thing!  But it means the knowledge that the PAC members bring to the document will be critical for them to understand everything that's discussed.  (I admit that I had difficulty following some of the heavy ion highlights.)  During your PAC talk, I could imagine that you might get one or two "what's this mean?" questions from members who had their interest tweaked by some figure.  Be prepared.

 

--  Pg 13, Fig 2-9 caption:  j_T is ~ Delta R * z * pT_jet.  (The "* z" is

missing.)

 

--  Pg 16, 2nd last line:  "... into a new ERA of lower x ..."  (Admittedly, this is just a typo.  But I simply couldn't read past it!)

 

--  Pg 33:  The upper paragraph says Fig 3-2 is from p-Au running.  The figure caption says it's from p+p.  I suspect the figure caption is correct.

 

--  Pg 36:  At present, there is nothing in Sect 3.2 "Dataset for inclusive jet and dijet A_LL".  I'm probably the internal expert here.  Should I prepare a brief paragraph and update our standard Runs 9+15 projection plot for insertion here?

 

I'll drop you another note after I've made it through the Runs 16&17 requests sections.  I might (or might not) also have some retrospective suggestions for the Executive Summary at that time.

 

Carl

 

pp,pA BUR

 request and projections for pp,pA

STAR run18-19 BUR

STAR run16-17 BUR

CAD luminosity projection: 

http://www.rhichome.bnl.gov/RHIC/Runs/RhicProjections.pdf

Overleaf document: 
https://www.overleaf.com/8923878fsmcynsyyzjh#/33782541/

weekly meeting eZuce: 
Title: STAR BUR 2017
Description:
Community: STAR
Meeting type: Open Meeting (Round Table)
Meeting Access Information: eZuce SRN
Application http://srn.ezuce.com/joinSRN?meeting=M2MvMB2a2iDMDl929MDM92
Mobile App : Meeting ID: 102 3196
or Link: http://srn.ezuce.com/join?meeting=M2MvMB2a2iDMDl929MDM92
- Phone Bridge ID: 102 3196

The Charge:

<<<<<<<<<<< 

 

A call for the annual Beam Use Request (BUR) has been sent from the BNL ALD to RHIC collaborations on February 22nd, 2017:

Dear RHIC Spokespersons:

I am writing to request that you submit the annual Beam Use Request for the RHIC runs in 2018 and 2019 and related material.

We current[ly] anticipate, assuming favorable budget conditions, runs of 15 cryo-weeks (including 2 weeks for the Coherent electron Cooling test)

in FY2018 and 24 cryo-weeks each in FY2019 and FY2020. Less favorable,

but still likely, budget conditions would only allow for a combined run of 20 cryo-weeks in FY2019/FY2020. The beam use request should consider both possibilities.

The submissions are due by May 15, 2017. Since PHENIX has ended data taking and sPHENIX has not yet started construction, I expect to receive a BUR from STAR only.

I also ask STAR and PHENIX to report on the status of analyses of data from previous RHIC runs, especially the runs in 2014-16.

In addition, I invite the STAR and sPHENIX Collaborations to present letters of intent for proposals of modest forward upgrades to their detectors for data taking after 2021 for consideration by the PAC.

The dates for this year’s RHIC PAC meeting are June 15-16, 2017. A list of current PAC members is attached for your information.

Thanks in advance,

Berndt

 

The Committee and responsibilities

Gang, Voloshin, Prithwish (Isobar for CME), 
Grazyna,  Geurts (BES-II), 
Cebra, Herrmann (FXT), 
Lisa, Xiaofeng (general), 
Zhenyu, Gregory (HI accomplishments), 
Renee, Oleg Eyser (Spin accomplishments), 
Flemming, Rosi (Detector upgrades)
Jerome (software)

Summary Tables

 Summary Tables 

for run 18 

year Energy  time species events priority sequence

 

18

 

200 GeV

 

200 GeV

 

27 GeV

  3.5-wk

 

  3.5-wk

 

  2-wk

Ru+Ru

 

Zr+Zr

 

Au+Au

1.2B MB

 

1.2B MB

 

>500M MB

1

 

1

 

2

2

2

3

3.0 GeV (FXT)

  3 days?

Au+Au

100M MB

3

1

for run 19 

energy  weeks Events FXT days events
19.6 4.5 400M 4.5 2 100M
14.5 5.5 300M 3.9 2 100M
11.5 5? 230M 3.5 2 100M
62.4     7.7 2 100M
39     6.2 2 100M
27     5.2 2 100M

Plan B: 

energy  weeks Events FXT days events
19.6 4.5 400M 4.5 2 100M
14.5 5.5 300M 3.9 2 100M
27 isobar 5? ? 3.5 2 100M
62.4     7.7 2 100M
39     6.2 2 100M
27     5.2 2 100M

for run 19/20 combined

for run 20 (after run 19)

energy weeks Events FXT days events
11.5 5 230M 3.5 2 100M
9.1 9.5 160M 3.2 2 100M
7.7 12 100M      


upgrade comments

Flemming

I can certainly do the iTPC and eTOF; In the previous BUR the upgrade parts are actually quite short 
e.g. the fpost just one-half page with layout. the BES_II stuff ~ 2 pages

I would suggest possibly the following:

Have a brief intro that shows the upgarde in the star detector context (one nice overview figure that is used ofte
here we could show one of the acceptance plots that shows what iTPC and eTFO brings acceptance

For iTPC 1 page
— brief description, status readiness for run-19
    picture of prototype from SDU, 

for EPD
since its coming up for run-18 some more info maybe 1.5 -2 pages

pics: detailled layout, picture of 1/8 quadrant installed, a simple performance plot from this year
The effect of improvement in event plane response realy is for the physics performance plots, that has such included.

eTOF one page
placement, status, performance


Rosi
That sounds reasonable.  Yes, I think an overview would show the
picture of STAR with all the detectors included + additional PID
acceptance gain since that is the point.

It should be rather easy to write a couple pages on the EPD with the
performance figures.  We have the performance improvement figures in
our proposal already, and then with something from this year's data
that should be good.

Will the etof have any performance plots from this year?

Perhaps we can pick one of the observables from BES I and show the
improvement with all three detectors.  Alex had already done something
like this for the lambda polarization (since I end up listening to
Mike a lot this is the one I'm most familiar with).  Though perhaps
this would be more appropriate in the sections discussing the physics.


STAR run19-20 BUR

 STAR Beam Use Request for Runs 19 and 20

 

Guidance

Meeting Schedule & Time Line

  • Weekly committee meetings on Tuesday at noon (EST)
    • Blue Jeans information:
      To join the Meeting:
      https://bluejeans.com/406880288
      
      To join via Room System:
      Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or-199.48.152.152
      Meeting ID : 406880288
      
      To join via phone :
      1)  Dial:
      	+1.408.740.7256 (United States)
      	+1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
      	+1.408.317.9253 (Alternate number)
      	(see all numbers - http://bluejeans.com/numbers)
      2)  Enter Conference ID : 406880288
      
  • Time lines:
    • draft document to Collaboration: April 17, 2018
    • final version to Berndt Mueller: May 1, 2018
    • NPP 2018 PAC Meeting: June 7-8, 2018
BUR 2018 Document

Official charge Berndt Mueller

Dear Helen & Zhangbu:

I am writing to solicit the STAR beam use requestDear Helen & Zhangbu:
 
I am writing to solicit the STAR beam use request for RHIC Run-19
and to request presentations from the RHIC collaborations at this
year’s PAC meeting, which is scheduled to be held on June 7-8, 2018.
 
We anticipate the 2019 RHIC run to constitute the first year of a
two-year high statistics beam energy scan. The 2017 PAC assigned
highest priority to proposed Au+Au runs at 11.5, 14.5, and 19.6 GeV, 
interleaved by brief fixed target runs at the same beam energies, as 
well as dedicated fixed target runs corresponding to CM energies of 
7.7, 6.2, and 5.2 GeV. The PAC tentatively recommended Au+Au runs in 
the collider mode at 9.1 and 7.7 GeV during the 2020 RHIC campaign.
 
The STAR collaboration should not simply take these tentative 
recommendations as a given, but reconsider and justify the prioritized 
set of beam energies and the requested accumulated statistics at each 
energy, assuming either 24 cryo-week runs or 20 cryo-week runs in each 
of the years 2019 and 2020.
 
The beam use request should be submitted no later than May 1 in order 
to allow the PAC members to study it in detail before the meeting.
 
In addition to the STAR beam use request, I would like to request
updates from STAR and PHENIX on the status of results from Runs 14-17 
(14-16 for PHENIX).
 
Best regards
Berndt


2018 PAC Committee Members 

M. Gazdzicki (CERN), J. Harris (Yale, chair), H. Huang (UCLA),
V. Koch (LBNL), J.C. Peng (UIUC), S. Pratt (MSU), K. Rajagopal (MIT),
A. Schaefer (Regensburg), M. Stephanov (UIC), and J. Velkovska (Vanderbilt).
Scott Pratt has indicated that he will not be able to attend.


STAR BUR Committee and Assignments

Physics Highlights (Runs 14-17) -- Heavy Ion: Xin Dong, Takafumi Niida; Spin: Kevin Adkins
Run 19/20 Requests --  BES2: Declan Keane, Grazyna Odyniec, Sevil Salur; FXT: Daniel Cebra, Terry Tarnowsky
Upgrades           --  Flemming Videbaek, Rosi Reed, Ingo Deppner
Ex-Officio         --  Helen Caines, Zhenyu Ye, Jim Drachenburg, Grigory Nigmatkulov
Frank Geurts (chair)

STAR run20-21 BUR

 STAR Beam Use Request for Runs 20 and 21

 

Guidance

Meeting Schedule & Time Line

  • Weekly committee meetings Tuesday noon - 1h30pm (EDT)
    • Blue Jeans information:
      To join the Meeting:
      https://bluejeans.com/625208370
      
      To join via Room System:
      Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or-199.48.152.152
      Meeting ID : 625 208 370
      
      To join via phone :
      1)  Dial:
      	+1.408.740.7256 (United States)
      	+1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
      	+1.408.317.9253 (Alternate number)
      	(see all numbers - http://bluejeans.com/numbers)
      2)  Enter Conference ID : 625 208 370
      
  • Time lines:
BUR 2019 Document

Official charge Berndt Mueller

Dear Helen & Zhangbu:
 
I am writing to solicit the STAR beam use request for RHIC Run-20
and to request presentations at this year’s PAC meeting, which is 
scheduled to be held on June 10-11, 2019.
 
The 2020 RHIC run will be the second year of the planned three-year
high statistics beam energy scan. The 2018 PAC tentatively assigned 
first priority for Runs 20-21 to data taking in the collider mode at 
7.7, 9.1, and 11.5 GeV CM energy, accumulating at least 100M, 160M,
and 230M min bias events, respectively. Second priority was assigned
to fixed target runs at 3.0, 3.2, 3.5, 5.2, and 6.2 GeV CM energy, 
acquiring at least 100M events at each energy, but did not specify 
exactly in which order these data should be taken, except that 
optimal use should be made of the availability of electron cooling 
to enhance the luminosity.
 
The STAR collaboration should not simply take these tentative 
recommendations as a given, but reconsider and justify the 
prioritized set of beam energies and the requested accumulated 
statistics at each energy, assuming either a 24 or a 28 cryo-week 
run in FY2020, followed by a 20 cryo-week run in FY2021. STAR should
also consult with C-AD about the number of dedicated LEReC 
commissioning weeks that are expected to be required during Run-20.
 
In addition, I request presentations on (i) the status of data 
analysis from previous RHIC runs and (ii) an update of the physics
goals for a short (16 cryo-weeks) forward Spin physics run in FY22 
with 500 GeV p+p collisions. 
 
The beam use request should be submitted no later than May 15 in 
order to allow the PAC members to study it in detail before the meeting.
 
Best regards
Berndt


2019 PAC Committee Members 

Masayuki Asakawa, John Harris (chair), Huan Huang, Volker Koch, Jen-Chieh Peng,
Scott Pratt , Krishna Rajagopal, Mikhail Stephanov, Julia Velkovska

Bill Christie, Dmitri Denisov, Jamie Dunlop, Wolfram Fischer, Achim Franz (secretary),
Hong Ma, Berndt Mueller, Thomas Roser, Ferdinand Willeke


STAR BUR Committee and Assignments

Physics Highlights -- 
  - Heavy Ions: Aya Jowzaee (BulkCorr), Hanseul Oh (Jets), Xin Dong (HF), Sevil Salur (Spectra);
  - Spin: Zilong Chang, Jinlong Zhang
BES-II Upgrades:  Irakli Chakaberia (iTPC), Tetyana Galatyuk (eTOF), Rosi Reed (EPD)
BES-II Run Plan: Dan Cebra, Declan Keane, Grazyna Odyniec, Xiaofeng Luo
pp 500 Run Plan: Jim Drachenberg, Elke Aschenauer, Scott Wissink
The case for AuAU at 16.7GeV: Xiaofeng Luo
The case for a small systems scan: Wei Li

Ex-Officio    --  Helen Caines, Zhenyu Ye, Grigory Nigmatkulov
Chair         --  Frank Geurts

STAR run21-25 BUR

 

Background Materials

BUR Documents (2020)


Meeting Schedule & Time Line

Official charge Berndt Mueller

For the Sept 10-11 meeting of the PAC I would like you to prepare the following documents and presentations:
 
STAR: Beam Use Request for Run-21 and Run-22
STAR and sPHENIX: Beam Use Requests for Runs 23-25
 
The BURs should be based on the following number of expected cryo-weeks:
2021:  24 (28)
2022:  20
2023:  24 (28)
2024:  24 (28)
2025:  24 (28)
 
Presentations only:
STAR: Update on spin physics and isobar run analyses
PHENIX: Update on ongoing analysis efforts and data archiving effort
sPHENIX: Update on EIC EoI based on sPHENIX
 
The Beam Use requests should be submitted in written form no later than August 31. 2020.
 
Thank you, Berndt


2020 PAC Committee Members (Mini-PAC version)

John Harris (chair), Huan Huang, Volker Koch, Jen-Chieh Peng,
Scott Pratt , Krishna Rajagopal, Mikhail Stephanov, Julia Velkovska

Maria Chamizo‐Llatas, Bill Christie, Dmitri Denisov, Jamie Dunlop, Wolfram Fischer, Achim Franz (secretary),
Hong Ma, Berndt Mueller, Thomas Roser, Ferdinand Willeke

STAR BUR Committee and Assignments

Two-year BUR: Run-21 BES-II completion:  Daniel Cebra, Frank Geurts, Grazna Odyniec, Flemming Videbaek
Run-22 pp500: Bernd Surrow, Carl Gagliardi, Renee Fatemi, Scott Wissink, Elke Aschenauer

STAR in sPHENIX Era (Runs 23-25): Run-23,25 AuAu200: Heavy-ion running during sPHENIX Subcommittee (Frank Geurts,chair)
Run-24 pp200,pAu200: Cold QCD folks

Other programs:
O+O: Jiangyong Jia and Wei Li
Au-Au 17 GeV: Xiaofeng Luo
FXT extension to higher and lower energies: Daniel Cebra

Physics Highlights:
Cold QCD: Maria Zurek and Ting Lin
Jets: Raghav Elayavalli
BulkCorr+Isobar: Prithwish Tribedy, Niseem Magdy, Jiangyong Jia
LFSUPC: Daniel Cebra
Heavy Flavor: Matt Kelsey

BESII+FXT progress: Daniel Cebra, Flemming Videbaek

Upgrades:
eTOF: Ingo Deppner
Forward : Elke Aschenauer, Scott Wissink, Flemming Videbaek

Ex-Officio    --  Helen Caines, Lijuan Ruan, Xin Dong, Rongrong Ma, Takafumi Niida
Chair         --  Ken Barish 

sPHENIX Running Periods (Runs 23-25)

 
.

Subcommittee on STAR in Runs 23-25

STAR in sPHENIX Era (Runs 23-25) :: BUR subcommittee


Run-23/25 AuAu200 Heavy-Ion running

Background Materials

PWG Inputs

Relevant guidance from Berndt Mueller

[...]

STAR and sPHENIX: Beam Use Requests for Runs 23-25

The BURs should be based on the following number of expected cryo-weeks:
2021: 24 (28)
2022: 20
2023: 24 (28)
2024: 24 (28)
2025: 24 (28)

[...]

Tasks/Assignments

JetCorr		: Raghav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, Peter Jacobs, Nihar Sahoo
BulkCorr	: Jiangyong Jia, Prithwish Tribedy, Fuqiang Wang
Heavy Flavor	: Zebo Tang, Barbara Trzeciak
LFS-UPC		: Tetyana Galatyuk, Wangmei Zha, Frank Geurts

chair: Frank Geurts


STAR run22-25 BUR

  Background Materials

BUR Documents (2021)

Meeting Schedule & Time Line

  • Time line:
    • draft document to Collaboration: May 24, 2021
    • final version to ALD: May 31, 2021
    • NPP 2021 PAC Meeting: June, 22-23 2021
  • Weekly committee meetings Friday 11:30 - 1 pm (EDT)
Meeting URL: https://ucr.zoom.us/j/92406695796?pwd=NmhLTzFFMWZTT0VXWGRMRWtFK3BZdz09

BNL Nuclear Physics PAC 2021 Charge and Agenda

Agenda: 
* STAR: Beam Use Requests for Runs 22-25 
* sPHENIX: Beam Use Requests for Runs 23-25 
* CeC: Beam Use Requests 

The BURs should be based on the following number of expected cryo-weeks. 
First number is minimal expected RHIC run duration and second number is optimal duration: 
2022: 18 (20) 
2023: 20 (28) 
2024: 20 (28) 
2025: 20 (28)


2021 PAC Committee Members 

Roberta Armaldi, John Harris (chair), Huan Huang, Volker Koch, Jen-Chieh Peng, Scott Pratt, 
Krishna Rajagopal, Ana Stasto, Mikhail Stephanov, Julia Velkovska 

Maria Chamizo‐Llatas, Bill Christie, Dmitri Denisov, Jamie Dunlop, Wolfram Fischer, Achim Franz (secretary), 
Hong Ma, Michiko Minty, Thomas Roser, Ferdinand Willeke

STAR BUR Committee and Assignments

Run-22 p+p 500 GeV:  
Run-24 p+p and p+A 200GeV:
Run-23,25 Au+Au 200GeV: Niseem, Toshihiro, Zhenyu, ... 

Other programs: 

Highlights: 
Cold QCD: CME Search and Isobar Run: 
Jets: 
Bulk Correlations: Niseem LFSUPC: 
Heavy Flavor: Zhenyu Run-22 Performance 

Upgrades: Forward : Akio, Zhenyu 

Ex-Officio -- Helen Caines, Lijuan Ruan, Xin Dong, Rongrong Ma, Takafumi Niida 
Chair -- Ken Barish 

STAR run23-25 BUR

Background Materials

BUR Documents (2022)

Meeting Schedule & Timeline

Meeting URL: https://ucr.zoom.us/j/99988762586?pwd=eWlTOXNxanphZHdLdHhoTGpTUkZPdz09
  • Meeting recordings
  • Friday, Apr 1, 2022
    • Timeline Update (official charge => BUR due to PAC on 5/6 and draft to collaboration a week earlier)
    • Last year's sampled luminosity assumptions (Rongrong's email)
    • DAQ Upgrade (Flemming)
    • Assumptions for BUR (discussion)

BNL Nuclear Physics PAC 2021 Charge and Agenda

* STAR: Beam Use Requests for Runs 23-25 
* sPHENIX: Beam Use Requests for Runs 23-25 
* CeC: Beam Use Requests 

The Beam Use Requests should be submitted in written form to PAC by May 6, 2022
The BURs should be based on the following number of cryo-weeks. The first number is the 
proposed RHIC run duration for scenario 1 and the second number corresponds to optimal 
duration (scenario 2) presented to the DOE-ONP in BNL’s FY24 Lab Managers’ Budget Briefing:
 
2023: 24 (28) 
2024: 24 (28) 
2025: 24 (28)


2022 PAC Committee Members

Roberta Armaldi, John Harris (chair), Huan Huang, Leticia Cunqueiro Mendez, Jen-Chieh Peng, 
Scott Pratt, Krishna Rajagopal, Claudia Ratti, Mikhail Stephanov, Julia Velkovska 

Maria Chamizo‐Llatas, Bill Christie, Dmitri Denisov, Jamie Dunlop, Wolfram Fischer, 
Achim Franz (secretary), Haiyan Gao, Hong Ma, Michiko Minty

STAR BUR Committee and Assignments

Daniel Brandenburg, Daniel Cebra, Raghav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, Frank Geurts, Jiangyong Jia, 
Xiaofeng Luo, Niseem Magdy, Sooraj Radhakrishnan, Nihar Sahoo, Sevil Salur, Subhash Singha, 
Barbara Trzeciak, Fuqiang Wang, Yi Yang, Zhenyu Ye, Hanna Zbroszczyk

Assignments (Google Doc)

Ex-Officio -- Helen Caines, Lijuan Ruan, Xin Dong, Rongrong Ma, Takafumi Niida 
Chair -- Ken Barish 

STAR run24-25 BUR

  

BUR Documents (2023 May) for Run24-25

Background Materials

Meeting Schedule & Timeline

  • Time line:
    • draft for internal review: July 28, 2023
    • for management review: August 4, 2023 
    • draft document to Collaboration: August 11, 2023
    • final version to ALD: August 18, 2023
    • NPP 2023 PAC Meeting: September, 11-12 2023
      • NPP PAC Meetings
  • Weekly committee meetings Tuesday 11 am - 12:30 pm (EDT)

Meeting URL: https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1602989668?pwd=dFhzajk3SGduQnk4dGMvMGlhV0FCQT09

  • Tuesday, August 8, 2023
Passcode: 6cQ.W=N6

1) General update -run23 ended early, 6 weeks Au+Au included into Run24, pp/pAu plan unchanged
2) Updated goals for run25 AuAu program (Rongrong), keep the projection plots unchanged.
3) 
Remaining discussion with Run24 if any
4) Plan to release BUR to collaboration on August 11. 
  • Tuesday, August 1, 2023
https://bnl.zoomgov.com/rec/share/bm0MLXU85u2h6I17eB1qWIW_C57taFl68dkW8OZZafAjnnDbvOZA9A4F_9fKLUgY.9Xrq8_5ej18qrA43 
Passcode: DP0%GsCG
1) General update -deadline for management review: August 4th
2) New luminosity projection for run24 from CAD (Elke, all), -CAD released RHIC luminosities Aug. 7.
3) Run24 pp/pAu splitting update (Xiaoxuan, all) - updated projection based on new CAD lumi
4) Summary on projections of run25 (Rongrong and all)
5) Internal review status (all)

 
  • Tuesday, July 25, 2023
Passcode: bX%+D9&i
1) General update : internal deadline July 28
2) Discussion on set-up time for run24 (Elke and all)  ---5.5weeks set up for run24
3) Run24 pp/pAu splitting, radial polarization (Xiaoxuan, all) --- wait for new CAD luminosity projection
4) Update on projections of run25 (Rongrong and all) - final version of projections
5) Status of BUR writing- each subsection 
https://www.overleaf.com/6843367976ddhtqhqsdzqq
6) Internal review assignments:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1812pdhU-Qdni0P-S8SZJ_IYehpfzy3gqDWYcTEhzFkU/edit

7) Anything else outstanding

  • Tuesday, July 18, 2023
Recordingshttps://bnl.zoomgov.com/rec/share/GsXzJV4TRY7zUNwZ2fB5PHF4Qi1AFV7O2ef7wBwS8OLS9oHGYDo0iA0nmYBPYg_z.q456xg3OxteG8UnB
Passcode: +4MhWQg^
1) General update - deadline July 21
2) Update & discussion on projections of run25 (Rongrong and all)
3) Update on projections of run24 (Xiaoxuan and all)
4) Status of BUR writing- each subsection 
5) Internal review assignments
  • Tuesday, July 11, 2023
1) General update -internal deadline July 21
2) Update on projection
3) Status and planning of BUR writing - each subsection
1) General update: internal deadline July 21 
2) Highlights from CF pwg (Hanna)
3) Highlights from light flavor & UPC (Daniel C)
4) discussion on radial polarization with Run24 (Jae, Carl)
1) General update
2) Cold-QCD highlights & projections on di-hadron correlation in pp/pAu   (Xiaoxuan )
3) Other updates: skip meeting of June 20 due to ovelap with trigger board mtg 
4) Presentation in next meeting on June 27 ((Hanna, Daniel). 

BNL Nuclear Physics PAC 2023 Charge and Agenda

 
*sPHENIX: Beam Use Requests for Runs 24-25
*STAR: Beam Use Requests for Runs 24-25

The Beam Use Requests should be submitted in written form to PAC by August 11, 2023 by emailing Fran and copy Haiyan and John the BUR directly or provide a link to access the BUR before the due date.

The BURs should be based on the following number of cryo-weeks. For Run 2024, we ask that you consider three scenarios for 20, 24 and 28 cryo-weeks each, given the uncertain budgetary situation. For Run 2025, the first number is the proposed RHIC run duration for scenario 1 and the second number corresponds to optimal duration (scenario 2) presented to the DOE-ONP in BNL’s FY25 Lab Managers’ Budget Briefing:

2024: 20/24/28
2025: 24 (28)
 

Note the eventual running cryo-weeks for each run will depend on the final budget guidance for that year.

2022 PAC Committee Members (to be updated 2023):  

Roberta Armaldi, John Harris (chair), Huan Huang, Leticia Cunqueiro Mendez, Jen-Chieh Peng,
Scott Pratt, Krishna Rajagopal, Claudia Ratti, Mikhail Stephanov, Julia Velkovska

Maria Chamizo‐Llatas, Bill Christie, Dmitri Denisov, Jamie Dunlop, Wolfram Fischer,
Achim Franz (secretary), Haiyan Gao, Hong Ma, Michiko Minty

STAR BUR Committee and Assignments:

Elke Aschenauer, Daniel Brandenburg, Daniel Cebra, Oleg Eyser, Carl Gagliardi, Jiangyong Jia, Rongrong Ma, Niseem Magdy, Alex Jentsch, Fuqiang Wang, Hanna Zbroszczyk
 
Ex-Officio -- Lijuan Ruan, Frank Geurts, ShinIchi Esumi, Sooraj Radhakrishnan, Barbara Trzeciak
Chair -- Qinghua Xu

STAR run24-25 BUR- backup



Background Materials

BUR Documents (2023 May) for run24-25

Meeting Schedule & Timeline

  • Time line:
    • draft for internal review: July 28, 2023
    • for management review: August 4, 2023 
    • draft document to Collaboration: August 11, 2023
    • final version to ALD: August 18, 2023
    • NPP 2023 PAC Meeting: September, 11-12 2023
      • NPP PAC Meetings
  • Weekly committee meetings Tuesday 11 am - 12:30 pm (EDT)

Meeting URL: https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1602989668?pwd=dFhzajk3SGduQnk4dGMvMGlhV0FCQT09

  • Tuesday, August 1, 2023
https://bnl.zoomgov.com/rec/share/bm0MLXU85u2h6I17eB1qWIW_C57taFl68dkW8OZZafAjnnDbvOZA9A4F_9fKLUgY.9Xrq8_5ej18qrA43 
Passcode: DP0%GsCG
1) General update -deadline for management review: August 4th
2) New luminosity projection for run24 from CAD (Elke, all)
3) Run24 pp/pAu splitting update (Xiaoxuan, all) - updated projection based on new CAD lumi
4) Summary on projections of run25 (Rongrong and all)
5) Internal review status (all)
  • Tuesday, July 25, 2023
Passcode: bX%+D9&i
1) General update : internal deadline July 28
2) Discussion on set-up time for run24 (Elke and all)  ---5.5weeks set up for run24
3) Run24 pp/pAu splitting, radial polarization (Xiaoxuan, all) --- wait for new CAD luminosity projection
4) Update on projections of run25 (Rongrong and all) - final version of projections
5) Status of BUR writing- each subsection 
https://www.overleaf.com/6843367976ddhtqhqsdzqq
6) Internal review assignments:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1812pdhU-Qdni0P-S8SZJ_IYehpfzy3gqDWYcTEhzFkU/edit

7) Anything else outstanding

  • Tuesday, July 18, 2023
Recordingshttps://bnl.zoomgov.com/rec/share/GsXzJV4TRY7zUNwZ2fB5PHF4Qi1AFV7O2ef7wBwS8OLS9oHGYDo0iA0nmYBPYg_z.q456xg3OxteG8UnB
Passcode: +4MhWQg^
1) General update - deadline July 21
2) Update & discussion on projections of run25 (Rongrong and all)
3) Update on projections of run24 (Xiaoxuan and all)
4) Status of BUR writing- each subsection 
5) Internal review assignments
  • Tuesday, July 11, 2023
1) General update -internal deadline July 21
2) Update on projection
3) Status and planning of BUR writing - each subsection
1) General update: internal deadline July 21 
2) Highlights from CF pwg (Hanna)
3) Highlights from light flavor & UPC (Daniel C)
4) discussion on radial polarization with Run24 (Jae, Carl)
1) General update
2) Cold-QCD highlights & projections on di-hadron correlation in pp/pAu   (Xiaoxuan )
3) Other updates: skip meeting of June 20 due to ovelap with trigger board mtg 
4) Presentation in next meeting on June 27 ((Hanna, Daniel). 

BNL Nuclear Physics PAC 2023 Charge and Agenda

 
*sPHENIX: Beam Use Requests for Runs 24-25
*STAR: Beam Use Requests for Runs 24-25

The Beam Use Requests should be submitted in written form to PAC by August 11, 2023 by emailing Fran and copy Haiyan and John the BUR directly or provide a link to access the BUR before the due date.

The BURs should be based on the following number of cryo-weeks. For Run 2024, we ask that you consider three scenarios for 20, 24 and 28 cryo-weeks each, given the uncertain budgetary situation. For Run 2025, the first number is the proposed RHIC run duration for scenario 1 and the second number corresponds to optimal duration (scenario 2) presented to the DOE-ONP in BNL’s FY25 Lab Managers’ Budget Briefing:

2024: 20/24/28
2025: 24 (28)
 

Note the eventual running cryo-weeks for each run will depend on the final budget guidance for that year.

2022 PAC Committee Members (to be updated 2023):  

Roberta Armaldi, John Harris (chair), Huan Huang, Leticia Cunqueiro Mendez, Jen-Chieh Peng,
Scott Pratt, Krishna Rajagopal, Claudia Ratti, Mikhail Stephanov, Julia Velkovska

Maria Chamizo‐Llatas, Bill Christie, Dmitri Denisov, Jamie Dunlop, Wolfram Fischer,
Achim Franz (secretary), Haiyan Gao, Hong Ma, Michiko Minty

STAR BUR Committee and Assignments:

Elke Aschenauer, Daniel Brandenburg, Daniel Cebra, Oleg Eyser, Carl Gagliardi, Jiangyong Jia, Rongrong Ma, Niseem Magdy, Alex Jentsch, Fuqiang Wang, Hanna Zbroszczyk
 
Ex-Officio -- Lijuan Ruan, Frank Geurts, ShinIchi Esumi, Sooraj Radhakrishnan, Barbara Trzeciak
Chair -- Qinghua Xu

STAR run25 BUR

  

BUR Documents  for Run25

Background Materials

Timeline

  • committee review: October 28, 2024 
  • draft document to Collaboration: October  30, 2024
  • final version to ALD: Novemer 3, 2024
  • NPP 2024 PAC Meeting: November 7-8, 2024


BNL Nuclear Physics PAC 2024 Charge and Agenda

The run scenarios for Run 25 (FY25) to consider:
• 20-week operation (instead of 22-week guidance because 2 weeks already
taken by Run 24)
• 28-week operation assuming we can extend the run. (I will talk to CAD &
EIC about possible a further operation and its consequences).

Timetable for the BUR 2025/26
• End of Run 24 – October 21, 2024
• CAD provides guidance for performance by October 28, 2024
• Experiments finalize and submit the BUR to me/PAC by November 3, 204.
• PAC meets on November 7, 2024

2024 PAC Committee Members:  

STAR BUR Committee:

Frank Geurts, Jiangyong Jia, Lijuan Ruan, Qinghua Xu
internal reviewers: Helen Caines, Zhangbu Xu