- devika's home page
- Posts
- 2018
- May (1)
- 2017
- 2016
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (5)
- March (4)
- January (3)
- 2015
- 2014
- November (4)
- September (3)
- August (4)
- July (1)
- June (7)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (1)
- February (4)
- January (7)
- 2013
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Run 13 BEMC Calibration : Relative Calibration [MIP analysis]
Updated on Sat, 2016-04-02 08:35. Originally created by devika on 2015-02-24 10:26.
*******************
cluster_eng_momentum_cut_for_outtermost2_eta_rings
EMC-draft-08-18-15
compare <E/P> vs 1/3x3 isolation ratio (ratio-not corrected) between E in <E/P> is corrected single tower energy and E in <E/P> being non-corrected 2x2 cluster energy. ---plots
clusterEng_E/Pfit_ringbyring
2x2cluserEng VS TDR and singleTowerEng Vs TDR
TDR-Vs-1/3x3_isolation
TDR-1D distribution_ring-by-ring--BHT3 trigger
MIP-Gain-Luminosity dependance-period1
zdc1 -> <zdc> ~200K - (MIPGainzdc1 -MIPGainzdc2)/ MIPGainzdc1
Z_vertex distribution with increasing luminosity
ZDC-dependance-on-BHT1-trigger-electron-postron-asymmtery
Is the E/P drop with momentum really a artifact of Momentum cuts?
BHT1-EoverPvsP-2D-plots-[drop]
BHT1-Energy-distributions-in-momentum-slices
BHT1-Mean-EoverPvs-of-electrons-and-positrons-in-momentum
BHT1-EoverP-vs-momentum slices-Electron-and-postron-Distributions-with-statistics
BHT1-mean-E/P vs ringID (eta) for electrons and positrons
BHT3-EoverPvsP-2D-plots
BHT3-MeanEoverP-in-momentum-slices
BHT3-MeanEoverP-of-electrons-and-positrons-in-momentum-slices
BHT3-Energy-distribution-in-momentum-slices
BHT3-EoverP-vs-momentum-slices-Electron-and-positron-Distributions-with-statistics
BHT3-EoverP-vs-ringID
Unbiased-EoverP-vs-ringID
Track Cuts:
Isolation cut:
Iso_cut
Iso_cut_vs_Energy
Iso_cut_vs_momentum
Iso_cut_vs_EoverP
minimum nHits cut 10-> 25
05/28/2015
Renee's Proposal
cut and matched unmatched distributions
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
E vs P distributions
BHT0-Triggered - Momentum dependance
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
BHT1-Trigger - Momentum dependance
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
BHT2-Trigger - Momentum dependance
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Unbiased-Trigger - Momentum dependance
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
BHT triggers (BHT0,BHT1,BHT2) E/P Vs P Distributions
Run 13/12 500 GeV calibration update - EMC2 meeting, 3/31/15
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
HT Trigger options / ID for run 13
Electron-analysis
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Luminosity information:
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/common/common2013/trigger2013/lumipp500GeV/lum_pertriggerid_pp2013_500GeV.txt
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
run13/run12 calibration presentation to emc2 meeting:
emc2-meeting-03-03-15
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
TEST SAMPLE ---- 10 runs
********************************
Complete procedure/algorithm of clibration was done using above test sample :==> 80 % of the algorithm /code is well understood .
A detail discussion about trigger option / cuts will present to W- meeting.
Results from the test Sample ------------------------------------
1) Tree production from MuDsts.
2) Run MIP analysis code and produce MIP ADC spectrum for each Tower .
3) Fit MIP ADC spectrum with "gaus"*"landau" and extract mean ADC
mip-adc-plots
mip-statistics
4) Remove bad towers by looking at mip-adc-plots and repeat 3)
5) Run Electron analysis code and produce E/P spectrum in eta rings (40: - 120 towers in each) and crate slices ( 30x20) , ( each crate slice- 8 towers at same eta).
6) Fit E/P with "gaus"+"expo" combined and extract avg E/P per eta ring for outer eta and per crate slice for inner eta.
electron-E/p-plots
electron-statistics-1
electron-gains
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Outer eta E/P spectrum is producesd only using BHT2 hard ware triggerd events. Since the test sample I used is low in statistics I have 0 events in this particuler trigger which passes the cuts.
ex, Kevin's pp200 E/P plots
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/jkadkins/ElectronFits_2012Algo.pdf
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Run 13 BEMC Calibration : Relative Calibration [MIP analysis]
Run-13 -Period1 BEMC-Calibration
Distributions requested by EMC meeting on 11/10/15 of various trigger options : (click here)
*******************
cluster_eng_momentum_cut_for_outtermost2_eta_rings
EMC-draft-08-18-15
compare <E/P> vs 1/3x3 isolation ratio (ratio-not corrected) between E in <E/P> is corrected single tower energy and E in <E/P> being non-corrected 2x2 cluster energy. ---plots
clusterEng_E/Pfit_ringbyring
2x2cluserEng VS TDR and singleTowerEng Vs TDR
TDR-Vs-1/3x3_isolation
TDR-1D distribution_ring-by-ring--BHT3 trigger
MIP-Gain-Luminosity dependance-period1
zdc1 -> <zdc> ~200K - (MIPGainzdc1 -MIPGainzdc2)/ MIPGainzdc1
zdc2 -> <zdc> ~280K - (MIPGainzdc1 -MIPGainzdc3)/ MIPGainzdc1
zdc3 -> <zdc> ~350K - (MIPGainzdc2 -MIPGainzdc3)/ MIPGainzdc2
zdc3 -> <zdc> ~350K - (MIPGainzdc2 -MIPGainzdc3)/ MIPGainzdc2
Z_vertex distribution with increasing luminosity
ZDC-dependance-on-BHT1-trigger-electron-postron-asymmtery
Is the E/P drop with momentum really a artifact of Momentum cuts?
BHT1-Energy-distributions-in-momentum-slices
BHT1-Mean-EoverPvs-of-electrons-and-positrons-in-momentum
BHT1-EoverP-vs-momentum slices-Electron-and-postron-Distributions-with-statistics
BHT1-mean-E/P vs ringID (eta) for electrons and positrons
BHT3-EoverPvsP-2D-plots
BHT3-MeanEoverP-in-momentum-slices
BHT3-MeanEoverP-of-electrons-and-positrons-in-momentum-slices
BHT3-Energy-distribution-in-momentum-slices
BHT3-EoverP-vs-momentum-slices-Electron-and-positron-Distributions-with-statistics
BHT3-EoverP-vs-ringID
Unbiased-EoverP-vs-ringID
Track Cuts:
Isolation cut:
Iso_cut
Iso_cut_vs_Energy
Iso_cut_vs_momentum
Iso_cut_vs_EoverP
minimum nHits cut 10-> 25
05/28/2015
Renee's Proposal
BHT3 - threshold=7.3 GeV
conditions:
if ( ( (BHT3&&BHT3->DidFire()) && !(BHT2&&BHT2->DidFire()) &&
conditions:
if ( ( (BHT3&&BHT3->DidFire()) && !(BHT2&&BHT2->DidFire()) &&
!(BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) && !(BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT3->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT2- threshold=6.0 GeV
condition:
if ( ( (BHT2&&BHT2->DidFire()) && !(BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) &&
!(BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT2->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT1 - threshold=4.2 GeV
condition:
if ( ( (BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) && ! (BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT1->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT0 - threshold=2.6 GeV
condition:
if (BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire()) BHT0->Fill()
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
JP2
Condition:
if (JP2&&JP2->DidFire()) JP2->Fill()
EoverPvsP Mom-5-10 Mom-7-10 meanE/PvsP
{
BHT3->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT2- threshold=6.0 GeV
condition:
if ( ( (BHT2&&BHT2->DidFire()) && !(BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) &&
!(BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT2->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT1 - threshold=4.2 GeV
condition:
if ( ( (BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) && ! (BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT1->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT0 - threshold=2.6 GeV
condition:
if (BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire()) BHT0->Fill()
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
JP2
Condition:
if (JP2&&JP2->DidFire()) JP2->Fill()
EoverPvsP Mom-5-10 Mom-7-10 meanE/PvsP
********************************
EMC meeting updates 05/26/15
Updates
********************************
EoverP vs P 2D distributions All
BHT
Unbiased
JP2
EoverP momentum dependance
Unbiased
BHT3
JP2
EoverP distributions ring by ring:
trackP cuts 1.5 GeV and 10 GeV
isolation cut = 0.9
Unbiased
JP2
BHT3
**********************************************************************************
EMC meeting updates 05/12/15
trigger Options
cutsNew
mip-analysis
Trigger Bias
1) All triggered events
Mean E/P vs Momentum Ranges
Unbiased-nosoftware-triggers
Electron Analysis----Relative Calibration
run12-run13-gains-all eta
Trigger Options Selection
ALl-rings-and-crates-E/P-distributions
Unbiased trigger option and isolation cut 0.9
Unbiased trigger option and isolation cut 0.85
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
*****************************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
EMC meeting updates 05/26/15
Updates
********************************
EoverP vs P 2D distributions All
BHT
Unbiased
JP2
EoverP momentum dependance
Unbiased
BHT3
JP2
EoverP distributions ring by ring:
trackP cuts 1.5 GeV and 10 GeV
isolation cut = 0.9
Unbiased
JP2
BHT3
**********************************************************************************
EMC meeting updates 05/12/15
trigger Options
cutsNew
mip-analysis
Trigger Bias
1) All triggered events
Mean E/P vs Momentum Ranges
Unbiased-nosoftware-triggers
Electron Analysis----Relative Calibration
run12-run13-gains-all eta
Trigger Options Selection
ALl-rings-and-crates-E/P-distributions
Unbiased trigger option and isolation cut 0.9
Unbiased trigger option and isolation cut 0.85
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
*****************************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************************
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************cut and matched unmatched distributions
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
E vs P distributions
BHT0-Triggered - Momentum dependance
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
BHT1-Trigger - Momentum dependance
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
BHT2-Trigger - Momentum dependance
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Unbiased-Trigger - Momentum dependance
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
BHT triggers (BHT0,BHT1,BHT2) E/P Vs P Distributions
Run 13/12 500 GeV calibration update - EMC2 meeting, 3/31/15
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
HT Trigger options / ID for run 13
Electron-analysis
| BHT0*VPD | 430202 |
| BHT0*VPD | 430222 |
| BHT0*VPD | 430232 |
| BHT1*VPDMB | 430203 |
| BHT1*VPDMB | 430223 |
| BHT1*VPDMB | 430243 |
| BHT2 | 430204 |
| BHT2*BBCMB | 430207 |
| BHT2*BJP1 | 430205 |
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Luminosity information:
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/common/common2013/trigger2013/lumipp500GeV/lum_pertriggerid_pp2013_500GeV.txt
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
run13/run12 calibration presentation to emc2 meeting:
emc2-meeting-03-03-15
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
TEST SAMPLE ---- 10 runs
********************************
Complete procedure/algorithm of clibration was done using above test sample :==> 80 % of the algorithm /code is well understood .
A detail discussion about trigger option / cuts will present to W- meeting.
Results from the test Sample ------------------------------------
1) Tree production from MuDsts.
2) Run MIP analysis code and produce MIP ADC spectrum for each Tower .
3) Fit MIP ADC spectrum with "gaus"*"landau" and extract mean ADC
mip-adc-plots
mip-statistics
4) Remove bad towers by looking at mip-adc-plots and repeat 3)
5) Run Electron analysis code and produce E/P spectrum in eta rings (40: - 120 towers in each) and crate slices ( 30x20) , ( each crate slice- 8 towers at same eta).
6) Fit E/P with "gaus"+"expo" combined and extract avg E/P per eta ring for outer eta and per crate slice for inner eta.
electron-E/p-plots
electron-statistics-1
electron-gains
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Outer eta E/P spectrum is producesd only using BHT2 hard ware triggerd events. Since the test sample I used is low in statistics I have 0 events in this particuler trigger which passes the cuts.
ex, Kevin's pp200 E/P plots
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/jkadkins/ElectronFits_2012Algo.pdf
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
»
- devika's blog
- Login or register to post comments