- dilks's home page
- Posts
- 2019
- 2018
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- August (2)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (5)
- 2017
- December (3)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (2)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- January (3)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (3)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (6)
- June (3)
- May (3)
- April (4)
- March (3)
- February (5)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (3)
- July (3)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (1)
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
A_LL PAPER STATUS LOG--------------------------------------------------------------
23 September 2016 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. integrated luminosities for run lists
2. polarization product averaging + error propagation
3. E_T vs pT --> progress toward E_T values for thresholds
.
2 September 2016 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. For book-keeping.... Run Lists: "good" FMS runs vs. runs which make it through polarization+rellum+A_LL ::::: [ RUN 12 ] ::::: [ RUN 13]
-- most omitted runs are either due to spikes in E, pT, or M distribution, or inconsistent relative luminosity measurement
-- longer gaps (especially in run 12) are due to missing scaler files (which result in no rellum measurement)
-- run 13 was not analysed for days > day 140
2. Luminosity-weighted average overall polarization plus error propagation
4 August 2016 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. missing scaler files from HPSS --> no relative luminosity --> omitted from analysis
- I've asked starsoft and Hank, 32-bit files are present, but as far as I'm aware, these do not have the luminosity bits I need for rellum
- See the starsoft hypernews conversation here: http://www.star.bnl.gov/HyperNews-star/protected/get/starsoft/9579.html
2. transverse component systematic
3. luminosity-weighted average polarizations
4. background asymmetry study progress
.
.
.
28 July 2016 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updates:
- Run-by-run polarizations, using polarimetry P0 and dP/dT measurements
- Relative Luminosity systematics summary
- Started working on background asymmetry study
.
.
.
21 July 2016 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updates:
- Removed HT, JP1+barrel, Dijet, and FMS base (OR of takealls) from trigger mask
- Noticed we are missing scaler files, e.g., for days 98 and 99; asked starsoft, but no conclusion reached
- Lowered minimum pT to 2/3 the peak height
- Minimum energy raised to 30 GeV
- Error on eta due to vertex width (see figure below)
To do:
- Started assessing what needs to be done for code review (see flowchart below)
- Finalize relative luminosity systematics
- Hot tower masking
- Horizontal error bars on A_LL (sensitive to calibration; need to decide on number; will be smaller than currently shown error bars)
- Sideband, like-sign, unlike-sign asymmetries
- Still waiting on ZDC polarimetry
Error on eta due to vertex width:
updated asymmetry (run12, all cells; other plots to be updated soon):
.
.
.
analysis code flowchart:
.
.
.
14 July 2016 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Run 12 and 13 500 GeV pi0 A_LL
Run Lists:
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/dilks/trgmon12/500/goodruns.dat
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/dilks/trgmon13/500/goodruns.dat
(
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/dilks/trgmon12/500/trigger.html
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/dilks/trgmon13/500/trigger.html
Relative Luminosity:
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/dilks/scalers2012/index.html
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/dilks/scalers2013/index.html
Kinematic Correlations (without pT-dep trigger cuts)
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/dilks/diag_plots12/diag_web.html
http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/dilks/diag_plots13/diag_web.html
Run-and-trigger-dependent pT cuts:
Systematics from Relative Luminosity:
Run 12
- cannot do VPD A_N self-consistency, since individual VPD PMTs were not read-out by scalers for this year
- therefore must use A_LL via ZDC vs. VPD
Run 13
- VPD A_N self-consistency works for this year, since PMTs were read-out by scalers
- R3 from ZDC minus R3 from VPD is a bimodal distribution (2 classes of spin patterns)
- VPDx bit not present
--> using VPDX = VPDe && VPDw (uppercase is 3-bit combination, lowercase is single bit)
--> rate-safe corrections still possible since it's based on the 3bc's
Remaining Hot Towers (after removing runs with "spikes" in pT or E or M)
run 12 pion hits
run 13 pion hits (note: these plots do not have run-by-run pT threshold cuts implemented yet)
Miscellaneous Concerns
- polarization scale uncertainty: https://wiki.bnl.gov/rhicspin/Results --> Run13 Updated Analysis Note --> page 9: DSA scale uncertainty is 6.6% for run12 and 6.4% for run13
Asymmetries and kinematics distributions
run12, all cells:
run 12, large cells
run 12, small cells:
------------------------------
run 13, all cells:
run 13, large cells:
run 13, small cells:
- dilks's blog
- Login or register to post comments