FGT HV issue - 20130329

Upper is demand HV value, Lower is measure HV value.
Fig1, HV module 0,

FGT HV slow control test - 20130329

Ramiro and I test the FGT HV control
HV off -> HV standby -> HV physics -> HV standby,

Notes on Pxl calibrations

Speaker : S.


Talk time : 13:30, Duration : 00:20

 

Alignment plots with new GEANT precision

Speaker : jonathan


Talk time : 13:10, Duration : 00:20

 

RT Ticket 2561: TPC efficiency vs. pT

 In response to RT ticket 2561, I wrote a simple Monte Carlo to test the effect of the TPC geometry on efficiency vs.

Low pT bin and unfolding

In today's meeting, the question arose regarding the 4 < pT < 5 GeV/c bin and unfolding.  Two cases are considered:

offline chain

Speaker : Hao Qiu


Talk time : 12:50, Duration : 00:20

 

Geant precision

Speaker : Flemming Videbaek


Talk time : 12:51, Duration : 00:20

 

2006 EEMC Neutral Pions: Updated Kinematic Range

Money Plots

Following the March 28 spin call, we decided to proceed with the following changes:

Perspectives for low-pT J/psi v2 in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV

 

J/psi update

HF PWG weekly meeeting March 28, 2013

Sal and Dima's Talk

2006 EEMC Neutral Pions: Update to Spin-PWG (March 28, 2013)

 

FGT DAQ Performance / DAQ Monitor - March 28, 2013 - Run 14087036

 

FGT DAQ Performance / DAQ Monitor - March 28, 2013 - Run 14087033

Polarization Corrections Run12 100GeV

I have incorporated run by run polarization corrections.

EEMC 2006 pi0 systematics

Review of the systematic uncertainties for the cross section and longitudinal spin asymmetries.

Updated pi0 longitudinal background asymmetries

The background asymmetry estimate has been 0.000 +/- 0.100 was used.  This was chosen as an very conservative number based on the studies in this blog and this blog last December, which most likely did not use all the available runs.  Due to the limited statistics, a fair amount of the observed fluctation seems due to statistics, and keeping with 0 +/- 0.1 would lead to the dominant systematic uncertainty.  Also, as some aspects of the analysis may have been updated since then, it is worth revisiting.  Since it was already decided a single value for all pT is sufficiently accurate, given the statistical fluctations, it is fair to consider the value of A_LL integrated over all pT.  The following show A_LL vs pT for each of three mass bins (0-0.1 GeV, 0.1-0.2 GeV, and 0.2-0.3 GeV) and the results for each mass bin are fit to a constant.

UPC Jpsi update

FGT SW meeting

2013-03-27 15:00
2013-03-27 16:30
America/New York
Wednesday, 27 March 2013
Evo phone ID 14 8465, pwd: 2589, at 19:00 (GMT), duration : 01:30