STAR Protected
q-statistics vs EMCICs
The goal of this study is to confront results from EMCIC fit and Tsallis distribution to spectra obtained from event generator where we know all parameters like total multiplicity, energy, temperat
12 Dec
December 2008 posts
STAR Electronic Shiftlog (ESL) Administrator Manual
STAR Electronic Shiftlog (ESL) Administration guide
The STAR (ESL) Electronic Shiftlog is written in JSP (Java server pages) and requires a web server that can render JSP content.
STAR Management Meeting
BNL, 50-I-189, at 15:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
Conference Phone Number: 510 486 7333
Time: 10 - 11 am EDT
* --===================================--*
Agenda:
1) QM09 abstract - Bedanga
2) Shift sign up - Olga
3) Analysis / Coll. Meeting dates - Nu
4) Run9 goals and prioriies - Jamie
5) STAR Parity Violation Analysis - Nu
6) India trip - Bernd/Zhangbu/Nu
7) AoB
* --===================================--*
Brief Summary:
1) Attending: Helen, Jamie, Bill, Olga, Zhangbu, Nu
2) Parity analysis: GPC / check in Run7(?)
Notes:
1) QM09 abstract deadline: Dec. 15th
2) Integration meeting Dec. 4th at MIT
3) BES meeting: Dec. 17-18 at BNL: summarise goals and next steps in BES
4) Jacks' cmmittee is ready to request GPC for the parity violation analysis. WIll push for QM09 talk. Joint Collolquia at BNL on March 26, Thursday morning.
Server list and various parameters
Here will be a server list (only those servers participating in various replication scenarios)
Cluster energy fraction in 3x3 patch: detector eta > 1.5
Energy fraction from NxN cluster in 3x3 patch: detector eta > 1.5
Figure 1a: 2x1/3x3 energy fraction [number of counts per given fraction]
Cluster energy fraction in 3x3 patch: detector eta < 1.5
Energy fraction from NxN cluster in 3x3 patch: detector eta < 1.5
Figure 1a: 2x1/3x3 energy fraction [number of counts per given fraction]
Cluster energy fraction in 0.7 radius: detector eta > 1.5
Energy fraction in NxN cluster within r=0.7 radius: detector eta < 1.5
Figure 1a: 2x1/0.7 energy fraction [number of counts per given fraction]
Cluster energy fraction in 0.7 radius: detector eta < 1.5
Energy fraction in NxN cluster within r=0.7 radius: detector eta < 1.5
Figure 1a: 2x1/0.7 energy fraction [number of counts per given fraction]
Yield vs. NxN cluster energy fraction in r=0.7
Yield vs. NxN cluster energy fraction in r=0.7
Figure 1c: 2x1/0.7 ratio
Efficiency vs. NxN cluster energy fraction in r=0.7
Efficiency vs. NxN cluster energy fraction in r=0.7
Figure 1b: 2x1/0.7 ratio
Energy fraction in NxN cluster within r=0.7 radius
Energy fraction in NxN cluster within r=0.7 radius
Figure 1a: 2x1/0.7 ratio
2008.11.18 Cluster isolation cuts: 2x1 vs. 2x2 vs. 3x3
Ilya Selyuzhenkov November 18, 2008