2008.11.25 Yiled vs. analysis cuts: eta dependence
Ilya Selyuzhenkov November 25, 2008
Data sets:
- pp2006 - STAR 2006 pp longitudinal data (~ 3.164 pb^1)
- gamma-jet[gamma-filtered] - data-driven Prompt Photon [p6410EemcGammaFilter] events.
Partonic pt range 2-25 GeV. - QCD jets[gamma-filtered] - data-driven QCD [p6410EemcGammaFilter] events.
Partonic pt range 2-25 GeV.
Some observation
- Fig. 1 [upper&lower left, 3rd bin] indicates that
cluster energy isolation is the most important cut
for signal/background separation - Fig.1 [lower right, 3rd bin] shows that
R_cluster cut is independent from (or orthogonal to) other cuts - Fig.1 [upper&lower left 4th bin] shows that
cut on neutral energy fraction for the away side jet
rejects more signal that background events
We probably need to reconsider that cut - Fig.2 [lower left, 5th bin] shows that
charge particle veto significantly improves
signal to background ratio - Fig.3 [lower left, 5th bin] shows that
in the region were we do not have TPC tracking (photon eta > 1.5)
charge particle veto is not efficient,
although there is still some improvement from this cut.
This probably due to tracks with eta <1.5
which fall into large isolation radius r=0.7.
Fig.2 [lower right, 5th bin] shows that
charge particle veto also independent from other cuts
Yield vs. various analysis cuts
List of cuts (sorted according to bin number in Figs. 1-3. [No SMD sided residual cuts]):
- N_events : total number of di-jet events found by the jet-finder
- cos(phi_gamma - phi_jet) < -0.8 : gamma-jet opposite in phi
- R_{3x3cluster}: Energy in 3x3 cluster of EEMC tower to the total jet energy
R_{3x3cluster}>0.9 for Fig. 1, and it is disabled in Fig. 2 and 3 - R_EM^jet < 0.9 : neutral energy fraction cut for on away side jet
- N_ch=0 : no charge tracks associated with a gamma candidate
- N_bTow = 0 : no barrel towers associated with a gamma candidate (gamma in the endcap)
- N_(5-strip cluster)^u > 2 : minimum number of strips in EEMC SMD u-plane cluster around peak
- N_(5-strip cluster)^v > 2 : minimum number of strips in EEMC SMD v-plane cluster around peak
- gamma-algo fail : my algorithm failed to match tower with SMD uv-intersection, etc...
- Tow:SMD match : SMD uv-intersection has a tower which is not in a 3x3 cluster
Figure 1: Number of accepted events vs. various analysis cuts
The starting number of events (shown in first bin of the plots) is
the number of di-jets with reconstructed gamma_pt>7 GeV and jet_pt>5 GeV
upper left: cuts applied independently
upper right: expept this cut fired
(event passed all other cuts and being rejected by this cut)
lower left: "cuts applied independently" normalized by the total number of events
lower right: "expept this cut fired" normalized by the total number of events
Figure 2: Same as Fig.1 except: no R_cluster cut and photon detector eta < 1.5
(eta region where we do have most of the TPC tracking)
Figure 3: Same as Fig.1 except: no R_cluster cut and photon detector eta > 1.5
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments