Sort by:[Date]

AuAu@19.6GeV:Dependence of fitted HBT radii on fit range

Dependence of fitted HBT radii on fit range for two analyses (w/ and w/o electron cut)

  • the most central AuAu@19.6 GeV collisions (bin1)

AuAu@19.6GeV: Fit Study

The goal of this study is to understand the discrepancy in fit results from analyses w/ and w/o electron cut.  Here I will mostly focus on the first kT bin (0.15-0.25 GeV/c) since  the l

Single-particle plots made using the new pixel fast simulator

Attached are pdf files giving efficiencies for all three inner silicon detectors vs.

Cross Talk in the BSMD

With the StEmcSimulatorMaker recently cleaned up and streamlined (thanks again, Adam), it wasn't a difficult task to simulate the effect of cross talk between the fibers in the BSMD readout.  Nom

L2 Testbed

L2 Testbed

A Brief Overview of the New Pixel Fast Simulator

The new StPixelFastSimMaker imposes the pixel structure on the PXL detector and the strip structure on the IST detector.  For each event the simulator loops over StMcPixelHits, determines which p

g-g suppression in Pythia

I'm concerned about an apparent deficit of g-g scattering events in our CDF Tune A Pythia samples.  I first noticed this deficit when I was looking at MC asymmetries for pi-minus production, where the difference between asymmetries from g-g and q-g events is extreme.  For reference, here is Vogelsang's prediction for the subprocess mixture for inclusive pi0 production:

Compare that to the following plot from Pythia for pi-plus production after combining partonic samples starting at 3_4:

If I add 2_3 GeV the gg contribution at low pT gets a boost, but I'm still seeing ~zero pions from g-g scattering at 8 GeV, where Vogelsang predicts 20% g-g. 

Renee suggested skipping the observables and just plotting the event partonic pT.  The turnover from gg to qg occurs at 3 GeV ... seems too low to me.  On the other hand, the mixture is ~20% g-g at 16 GeV, which seems about right.

One other tidbit for any Pythia tuners out there.  When I was running standalone Pythia to get the various partonic xsections for weighting purposes I saw a number of advisory warnings like

Advisory warning: maximum violated by 1.120D+00 in event 625
XSEC(28,1) increased to 5.982D-01

in this case, I was running the 5_7 sample.  The initial max value for the q-g xsec was 5.3392D-01, and the final measured xsec was 1.515D-01.  Not sure if it's significant.

Update 11-19-2007

I looked into the relationship between charged pion p_{T} and event partonic p_{T} in more detail.  Here are plot of charged pion multiplicity and mean pion p_{T} versus event p_{T}:

so g-g events actually produce more charged pions per event, but these pions are all at low p_{T}.  The second conclusion is reinforced by the PDF I've linked at the bottom of the page, which shows pion p_{T} spectra split by subprocess for a range of partonic p_{T} bins.  The g-g events have a much steeper slope.  Those plots are not normalized by the # of events per subprocess, so the conclusion about the number of pions per event is not immediately evident.

Update 11-27-2007

I tried manually rescaling the g-g scattering contribution to the PYTHIA asymmetries; it looks like increasing the g-g by a factor of 5 does a decent job of reproducing the NLO theoretical predictions:

no rescaling

multiply g-g by 3.0

multiply g-g by 5.0

References

Agreement Between "Polarized" Pythia and NLO pQCD
Updated Charged Pion A_{LL} predictions

Parallel Photon Studies

In working toward a prompt photon cross section measurement, we are using two analyses in parallel.  The first is a two dimensional fit using parameters identified in the earlier OPAL and ZE

Updated look at Electrons in BEMC for 2007

I've had a chance to incorporate the st_upsilon production into my check on the BEMC tower calibration.  There are now enough statistics to look at individual towers (see

Comparison between Normal and Test Runs (TPC Drift Problems)

This is my first post to drupal so I will limit it to two graphs
of the multiplicities for nTracks and nPoints for jets, comparing