Sort by:[Date]

JetCorr Follow-Up [05.22.2018] -- Run 12 vs. Run 9 Embedding

It was pointed out during my presentation to JetCorr on May 22nd, 2018 that while the Run 9 embedding and Run 9 data recoil jet (R = 0.3, charged) 'pT'  distributions fall on top of each other, t

jet sub-structure performance in AuAu Y14 HT in comparison with pp embedded (not final)

softdrop shuffling study

JetCorr Follow-Up [05.22.2018] -- Restricting EtTrg To PtParton Bin

While the various trigger, track, and tower distributions from the Run 9 dijet embedding agree well with our Run 9 pi0-triggered data, there's a significant excess in the embedding for towers with a r

VPDMB trigger bias for jets

 

MESON 2018

 MESON 2018

D0 v1 abstract

Update 05.25.2018 -- Run 9 Embedding: Closure Tests (R = 0.3, Charged)

Below are some closure tests using the response matrices from the Run 9 dijet embedding.  I had previously shown that the RFF and FF responses are consistent with each other, so you should be abl

TPC Inner Field Cage Currents' dependence on hall humidity

Note: a previous version of this page had incorrectly used relative humidity in the DAQ room instead of on the platform. This is now corrected, but the conclusions are unchanged.

HP2018 charmed meson