Home » Groups » Heavy Flavor

Upsilon Analysis in p+p 2009 data - Dataset QA

Updated on Fri, 2011-12-16 19:49. Originally created by peterson on 2011-09-09 19:14.
  • Dataset QA (Andrew Peterson)
    • Trigger ID, runs
      • Name
        Trigger id
        Lum [pb-1]
        P4 L [pb-1]
        Nevents [M]
        First Run
        Last Run
        Description
        Stream
      • Upsilon 22.855 1.978 1.381 10114071 10180030 Upsilon, reading ETOW BTOW TOF ESMD TPX BSMD upsilon
        Upsilon 240640 1.293 0.105 0.049 10114071 10117052 Broken, do not use upsilon
        Upsilon 240641 21.563 1.873 1.331 10117085 10180030 18 (4.3 GeV) < BHT && BBCMB && Upsilon at L2 upsilon
    • Run by Run QA
        • X-Axis is scaled because ROOT seemed to not want to fit anything that small
        • Z-Axis on first 2 and Y-Axis on second 2 are weighted by 1/(error on trigger ratio)
        • Once I have completed going through the run logs to throw out bad runs on that alone I will fit with Gaussians and keep up to 3 sigma
      • Runs thrown out:
        • 0 Magnetic Field (how did this even get flagged for Upsilon?)
          • 10172027
          • Δ Integrated Luminocity: 0.024188 pb-1
        • Fewer than 10,000 events in run
          • 10131011, 10137047, 10142045, 10143046, 10144033, 10144097, 10169015, 10172086 , 10173054
          • Δ Integrated Luminocity: 0.000276 pb-1
        • Marked as "bad" in the shift log
          • 10127044, 10128037, 10128051, 10128064, 10155017
          • Δ Integrated Luminocity: 4e-06 pb-1
            • Note: only 10127044 was presnet in the Luminocity files from Jamie
               
    • Integrated Luminosity estimate: 21.539 pb-1
    • Systematic Uncertainty

 

Groups: