- General information
- Data readiness
- Calibration
- BeamLine Constraint
- Run 10, Au+Au 200 GeV
- Run 10, Au+Au 39 GeV
- Run 11
- Run 12
- Run 13
- Run 15 pAu200
- Run 15 pp200
- Run 2 (200 GeV pp)
- Run 3 (200 GeV dAu and pp)
- Run 4 (pp)
- Run 5
- Run 6 (pp)
- Run 6: Issues with 2006 BeamLine calibration
- Run 7 (200GeV AuAu)
- Run 8 (200 GeV dAu and pp)
- Run 8 (9GeV AuAu)
- Run 9 (pp500 and pp200)
- Run 9, pp200 GeV Full Field (FF) - new calibration (May 2012)
- Calibration Run preparation
- Calibration Schedules
- Calibration topics by dataset
- Docs
- STAR Automated Calibration Project
- SVT Calibrations
- TPC Calibrations
- BeamLine Constraint
- Databases
- Quality Assurance
- Calibration
- Grid and Cloud
- Infrastructure
- Machine Learning
- Offline Software
- Production
- S&C internal group meetings
- Test tree
Run 9, pp200 GeV Full Field (FF) - new calibration (May 2012)
Updated on Sat, 2012-05-12 10:14. Originally created by aschmah on 2012-05-12 09:44.
Under:
Below are the resulting beamline intercept parameters with the new calibration from 2012. The black markers were removed due to low
statistics.
The slope parameters:
The direct comparison to the previously used 3D method shows some systematic differences. This could be either due to the new calibration parameters or due to systematics between the methods itself. We have compared the results from the 2D method for the new and old calibration parameters and could not find significant differences. Below are the values for old and new for one daq file (st_physics_10156091_raw_8030002.daq) and 5000 analyzed events. The pile up was always suppressed by requireing the highest ranked vertex.
parameter | old | new |
x | 0.3613 | 0.3651 |
y | -0.004416 | -0.01654 |
dxdz | 0.001005 | 0.001096 |
dydz | 9.934157e-05 | 0.0001507 |
It was decided to use the 2D results for the parametrization of the beamline. All parameters were uploaded to the database with +1 second offset to the timestamp.
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments