# 2009.10.26 Jason vs. CVS EEMC: removed SMD layers

Monte-Carlo setup:

- One photon per event
- Disabled new SMD layers (EXPS EBLS EFLS) in Jason geometry
**EEMC only and Full STAR**geometry configurations with LOW_EM option

Note:**LOW_EM option seems not to work for EEMC only configuration**(double checking)

(using Victor's geometry fix)- Throw particles flat in eta (1.08, 2.0), phi (0, 2pi), and pt (6-10 GeV)
- Using A2Emaker to get reconstructed Tower/SMD energy

(no EEMC SlowSimulator in chain) - Vertex z=0
- ~50K/per particle type
- Non-zero energy: 3 sigma above pedestal

Geometry configurations and notations (shown in the center of the plot):

**eemc-cvs**: EEMC only with geometry file from CVS (cAir-fixed)**full-cvs**: Full STAR with geometry file from CVS (cAir-fixed)**eemc-j-noL**: EEMC only with Jason geometry file (disabled 3-new SMD layers)**full-j-noL**: Full STAR with Jason geometry file (disabled 3-new SMD layers)

**Figure 1:** number of post-shower tiles

**Figure 2:** number of pre-1-shower tiles

**Figure 3:** number of pre-2-shower tiles

**Figure 4:** number of towers

### 2D

**Figure 5:** Average pre-shower1 energy

**Figure 6:** Average pre-shower2 energy

**Figure 7:** Average number of SMD-u strips

**Figure 8:** Average number of SMD-v strips

**Figure 9:** Average post-shower energy

### Sampling fraction

**Figure 10:** Sampling fraction 1x1 vs. thrown energy

**Figure 11:** Sampling fraction 2x1 vs. thrown energy

**Figure 12:** Sampling fraction 3x3 vs. thrown energy

**Figure 13:** Sampling fraction (total energy) vs. thrown energy

**Figure 14:** Sampling fraction 1x1

**Figure 15:** Sampling fraction 2x1

**Figure 16:** Sampling fraction 3x3

### SMD shower shapes

Groups:

- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments