# 2009.10.27: Jason EEMC geometry: comparison without LOW_EM option

Monte-Carlo setup:

- One photon per event
- Disabled new SMD layers (EXPS EBLS EFLS) in Jason geometry
**EEMC only and Full STAR**geometry configurations**without**LOW_EM option

(using Victor's geometry fix)- Throw particles flat in eta (1.08, 2.0), phi (0, 2pi), and pt (6-10 GeV)
- Using A2Emaker to get reconstructed Tower/SMD energy

(no EEMC SlowSimulator in chain) - Vertex z=0
- ~50K/per particle type
- Non-zero energy: 3 sigma above pedestal

Geometry configurations and notations (shown in the center of the plot):

**eemc-cvs**: EEMC only with geometry file from CVS (cAir-fixed)**full-cvs**: Full STAR with geometry file from CVS (cAir-fixed)**eemc-j-noL**: EEMC only with Jason geometry file (disabled 3-new SMD layers)**full-j-noL**: Full STAR with Jason geometry file (disabled 3-new SMD layers)

**Figure 1:** Sampling fraction 1x1

**Figure 2:** Sampling fraction 2x1

**Figure 3:** Sampling fraction 3x3

**Figure 4:** Sampling fraction total energy

**Figure 5:** Sampling fraction pre1-shower

**Figure 6:** Sampling fraction pre2-shower

**Figure 7:** Sampling fraction smd-u

**Figure 8:** Sampling fraction smd-v

**Figure 9:** Sampling fraction post-shower

### Sampling fraction vs. thrown energy

**Figure 10:** Sampling fraction 1x1 vs. thrown energy

**Figure 11:** Sampling fraction 2x1 vs. thrown energy

**Figure 12:** Sampling fraction 3x3 vs. thrown energy

**Figure 13:** Sampling fraction (tatal energy) vs. thrown energy

Groups:

- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments