- BEMC
- BEMC Detector Operator Manual
- Calibrations
- BPRS
- Run 8 BPRS Calibration
- 01 DB peds R9069005, 9067013
- 02 pedestal(capID)
- 03 tagging desynchronized capID
- 04 BPRS sees beam background?
- 05 ---- peds(softID,capID) & status table, ver=2.2, R9067013
- 06 MIP algo ver 1.1
- 07 BPRS peds vs. time
- 08 BPRS ped calculation using average
- 09 BPRS swaps, IGNORING Rory's finding from 2007, take 1
- 10 -------- BPRS swaps take2, _AFTER_ applying Rory's swaps
- 11 BPRS absolute gains from MIP, ver1.0 ( example of towers)
- 12 MIP gains ver1.0 (all tiles, also BTOW)
- 13 MIP algo, ver=1.1 (example of towers)
- 14 ---- MIP gains ver=1.6 , 90% of 4800 tiles ----
- 15 Broken BPRS channels ver=1.6, based on data from March of 2008
- 16 correlation of MIP ADC vs. raw slopes
- Run 9 BPRS Calibration
- Run 8 BPRS Calibration
- BSMD
- BTOW - Calibration Procedure
- Run 12 BTOW Calibration
- Run 3 BTOW Calibration
- Run 4 BTOW Calibration
- Run 5 BTOW Calibration
- Run 6 BTOW Calibration
- Run 7 BTOW Calibration
- Run 8 BTOW Calibration (2008)
- Run 9 BTOW Calibration
- BPRS
- Database
- Hardware
- Mapping
- Service Tasks
- Software
- Useful Documents
- EEMC
- ETOF
- FCS
- FGT
- FPD & FMS & FPS
- FTPC
- FTT
- HLT
- L3
- PMD
- PP2PP
- RICH
- Roman Pot Phase II*
- SSD
- SVT
- Slow Controls
- TPC
- TRG
- Trigger Detectors
- VPD
- test
12 MIP gains ver1.0 (all tiles, also BTOW)
Updated on Tue, 2009-03-10 14:45. Originally created by mattheww on 2008-11-19 15:54.
Under:
This is still work in progress, same algo as on previous post.
Now I run on 12M events (was 6 M) and do rudimentary QA on MIP spectra, which results with ~10% channel loss (the bottom figure). However, the average MIP response per tile is close to the final value.
Conclusion: only green & light yellow tiles have reasonable MIP response of ~15 ADC. For blue we need to rise HV, for red we can lower it (to reduce after pulsing). White area are masked/dead pixels.
Fig 1: BPRS MIP gains= gauss fit to MIP peak.
A) gains vs. eta & phi to see BPM pattern. B) gains with errors vs. softID, C) sigma MIP shape, D) tiles killed in QA
Fig 2: BTOW MIP gains= gauss fit to MIP peak. Content of this plot may change in next iteration.
A) gains vs. eta & phi. "ideal" MIP is at ADC=18, all towers. Yellow& red have significantly to high HV, light blue & blue have too low HV.
B) gains with errors vs. softID, C) sigma MIP shape, D) towers killed in QA
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments