- Bulk correlations
- Common
- GPC Paper Review: ANN-ASS pp Elastic Scattering at 200 GeV
- Heavy Flavor
- Jet-like correlations
- LFS-UPC
- Other Groups
- Peripheral Collisions
- Spin
- Spin PWG
- Physics Analysis
- 2006 EEMC Neutral Pion Cross Section and A_LL
- 2006 Gamma + Jet
- 2009 Lambda D_LL @ 200 GeV
- 2009 dijet x-sect/A_LL @ 200 GeV
- 2011 FMS Jet-like correlations @ 500 GeV
- 2011 FMS inclusive pions @ 500 GeV
- 2011 IFF @ 500 GeV
- 2011 Pions in Jets A_UT @ 500 GeV
- 2012 EEMC Neutral Pion A_LL
- 2012 IFF @ 200 GeV
- 2012 Jet A_LL @ 500 GeV
- 2012 Lambda D_TT @200GeV
- 2012 Pi0 - Jet A_LL @ 500
- 2012 Pions in Jets A_UT @ 200 GeV
- 2012 dijet A_LL @ 500
- 2012/13 FMS A_LL @ 500 GeV
- 2013 Di-jet A_LL @ 500 GeV
- A New Users Guide to PDSF Success
- Analyses from the early years
- (A) List of Physics Analysis Projects (obsolete)
- Common Analysis Trees
- EEMC Direct Photon Studies (Pibero Djawotho, 2006-2008)
- G/h Discrimination Algorithm (Willie)
- Neutral Pions 2005: Frank Simon
- Neutral strange particle transverse asymmetries (tpb)
- Photon-jet with the Endcap (Ilya Selyuzhenkov)
- Relative Luminosity Analysis
- Run 6 Dijet Cross Section (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 6 Dijet Double Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 6 Inclusive Jet Cross Section (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 6 Neutral Pions
- Run 6 Relative Luminosity (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 8 trigger planning (Jim Sowinski)
- Run 9

- Beam Polarizations
- Charged Pions
- Fully Reconstructed Ws
- Jet Trees
- W 2009 analysis , pp 500 GeV
- W 2011 AL
- W 2012 AL (begins here)
- W/Z 2013 Analysis

- Results and data
- Useful Links
- Weekly PWG Meetings
- Working Group Members
- Yearly Tasks

# Single spin asymmetry using cross formula

Updated on Thu, 2008-05-08 04:16. Originally created by tpb on 2008-05-08 04:16.
Under:

## Single Spin asymmetry using cross formula

Equation one shows the cross-formula used to calculate the single spin asymmetry.

Equation 1 |

where N is a particle yield, L(eft) and R(ight) indicate the side of the polarised beam to which the particle is produced and arrows indicate the polarisation direction of the beam. Equation one cancels acceptance and beam luminosity and allows simply the raw yields to be used for the calculation. The asymmetry can be calculated twice; once for each beam, summing over the polarisation states of the other beam to leave it "unpolarised". I previously used only particles produced at forward η when calculating the blue beam asymmetry, and backward η for yellow, but I now sum over the full η range for each. Equations two and three give the numbers for up/down polarisation for blue (westward at STAR) and yellow (eastward) beams respectively in terms of the contributions from the four different beam polarisation permutations, and these permutations are related to spin bits numbers in table one.

Equation 2 |

Equation 3 |

(in e.g. N(upUp), The first arrow refers to yellow beam polarisation, the second to blue beam.)

Beam polarisation | 4-bit spin bits | |
---|---|---|

Yellow | Blue | |

Up | Up | 5 |

Down | Up | 6 |

Up | Down | 9 |

Down | Down | 10 |

Table 1 |

The raw asymmetry is calculated for each RHIC fill, then divided by the polarisation for that fill to give the physics asymmetry. Final polarisation numbers (released December 2007) are used. The error on the raw asymmetry is calculated by propagation of the √(N) errors calculated for each particle yield. The final asymmetry error incorporates the polarisation error (statistical and systematic errors summed in quadrature). The fill-by-fill asymmetries for each K^{0}_{S} and Λ for each beam are shown in figures one and two. Anti-Λ results shall be forthcoming. An average asymmetry is calculated by performing a straight line χ^{2} fit through the fill-by-fill values with ROOT. Table one summarises the asymmetry results. The asymmetry error is the error from the ROOT fit and is statistical only. All fits give a good χ^{2} per degree of freedom and are consistent with zero within errors.

Figure 1a: K^{0}_{S} blue beam asymmetry |

Figure 1b: K^{0}_{S} yellow beam asymmetry |

Figure 2a: Λ blue beam asymmetry |

Figure 2b: Λ yellow beam asymmetry |

The above are summed over the entire p_{T} range available. I also divide the data into different transverse momentum bins and calculate the asymmetry as a function of p_{T}. Figures three and four show the p_{T}-dependent asymmetries. No p_{T} dependence is discernible.

Figure 3a: K^{0}_{S} p_{T}-dependent blue beam A_{N} |

Figure 3b: K^{0}_{S} p_{T}-dependent yellow beam A_{N} |

Figure 4a: Λ p_{T}-dependent blue beam A_{N} |

Figure 4b: Λ p_{T}-dependent yellow beam A_{N} |

»

- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments