- Bulk correlations
- Common
- GPC Paper Review: ANN-ASS pp Elastic Scattering at 200 GeV
- Hard Probes
- Heavy Flavor
- Jet-like correlations
- LFS-UPC
- Measurement of Single Transverse Spin Asymmetry, A_N in Proton–Proton Elastic Scattering at √s = 510 GeV
- Other Groups
- Peripheral Collisions
- Spin
- Spin PWG
- Results and data
- Spin/Cold-QCD Older Physics Analysis
- 2006 EEMC Neutral Pion Cross Section and A_LL
- 2006 Gamma + Jet
- 2009 Lambda D_LL @ 200 GeV
- 2009 dijet x-sect/A_LL @ 200 GeV
- 2011 FMS Jet-like correlations @ 500 GeV
- 2011 FMS inclusive pions @ 500 GeV
- 2011 IFF @ 500 GeV
- 2011 Pions in Jets A_UT @ 500 GeV
- 2012 EEMC Neutral Pion A_LL
- 2012 IFF @ 200 GeV
- 2012 Jet A_LL @ 500 GeV
- 2012 Lambda D_TT @200GeV
- 2012 Pi0 - Jet A_LL @ 500
- 2012 Pions in Jets A_UT @ 200 GeV
- 2012 dijet A_LL @ 500
- 2012/13 FMS A_LL @ 500 GeV
- 2013 Di-jet A_LL @ 500 GeV
- A New Users Guide to PDSF Success
- Analyses from the early years
- (A) List of Physics Analysis Projects (obsolete)
- Common Analysis Trees
- EEMC Direct Photon Studies (Pibero Djawotho, 2006-2008)
- 2006.07.31 First Look at SMD gamma/pi0 Discrimination
- 2006.08.04 Second Look at SMD gamma/pi0 Discrimination
- 2006.08.06 Comparison between EEMC fast and slow simulator
- 2006.09.15 Fit Parameters
- 2007.02.05 Reconstructed/Monte Carlo Photon Energy
- 2007.02.08 E_reco / E_mc vs. eta
- 2007.02.11 Reconstructed/Monte Carlo Muon Energy
- 2007.02.15 160 GeV photons
- 2007.02.15 20 GeV photons
- 2007.02.15 80 GeV photons
- 2007.02.15 Reconstructed/Monte Carlo Electron Energy
- 2007.02.19 10 GeV photons
- 2007.02.19 40 GeV photons
- 2007.02.19 5 GeV photons
- 2007.02.19 Summary of Reconstructed/Monte Carlo Photon Energy
- 2007.05.24 gamma/pi0 separation in EEMC using linear cut
- 2007.05.24 gamma/pi0 separation in EEMC using quadratic cut
- 2007.05.24 gamma/pi0 separation in EEMC using quadratic cut
- 2007.05.30 Efficiency of reconstructing photons in EEMC
- 2007.06.12 gamma/pi0 separation in EEMC at pT 5-10 GeV
- 2007.06.28 Photons in Pythia
- 2007.07.09 How to run the gamma fitter
- 2007.07.25 Revised gamma/pi0 algorithm in 2006 p+p collisions at sqrt(s)=200 GeV
- 2007.09.12 Endcap Electrons
- 2008.01.23 Endcap etas
- 2008.02.27 ESMD shape library
- 2008.02.28 ESMD QA for run 7136033
- 2008.03.04 A second look at eta mesons in the STAR Endcap Calorimeter
- 2008.03.08 Adding the SMD energy to E_reco/E_MC for Photons
- 2008.03.21 Chi square method
- 2008.04.08 Data-Driven Shower Shapes
- 2008.04.12 Data-Driven Residuals
- 2008.04.12 Pythia Gamma-Jets
- 2008.04.16 Jet Finder QA
- 2008.04.20 BUR 2009
- 2008.04.22 Run 6 Photon Yield Per Trigger
- 2008.05.07 Number of Jets
- 2008.05.09 Gamma-jets pT distributions
- 2008.05.19 Binning the shower shape library
- 2008.06.03 Jet A_LL Systematics
- 2008.06.18 Photon-jet reconstruction with the EEMC - Part 2 (STAR Collaboration Meeting - UC Davis)
- 2008.07.16 Extracting A_LL and DeltaG
- 2008.07.20 How to install Pythia 6 and 8 on your laptop?
- 2008.07.23 Hot Strips Identified by Hal Spinka
- 2008.07.24 Strips from Weihong's 2006 ppLong 20 runs
- G/h Discrimination Algorithm (Willie)
- Neutral Pions 2005: Frank Simon
- Neutral strange particle transverse asymmetries (tpb)
- Photon-jet with the Endcap (Ilya Selyuzhenkov)
- Relative Luminosity Analysis
- Run 6 Dijet Cross Section (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 6 Dijet Double Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 6 Inclusive Jet Cross Section (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 6 Neutral Pions
- Run 6 Relative Luminosity (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 8 trigger planning (Jim Sowinski)
- Run 9
- Beam Polarizations
- Charged Pions
- Fully Reconstructed Ws
- Jet Trees
- W 2009 analysis , pp 500 GeV
- W 2011 AL
- W 2012 AL (begins here)
- W/Z 2013 Analysis
- Useful Links
- Weekly PWG Meetings
- Working Group Members
- Yearly Tasks
2007.09.12 Endcap Electrons
Updated on Fri, 2010-07-16 11:08. Originally created by seluzhen on 2010-07-16 10:37.
Under:
Pibero Djawotho Last updated Wed Sep 12 08:29:53 EDT 2007
Endcap Electrons
This analysis is based on the work of Jan and Justin on SMD Profile Analysis for different TPC momenta. See here for a list of cuts. The original code used by Jan and Justin is here.
- Transverse running
- Analysis uses 64 out of 300 runs from 2006 pp transverse run
- MuDst are located at:
/star/institutions/iucf/balewski/prodOfficial06_muDst/
- No trigger selection
- Click here for SMD profiles of transverse electron candidates.
- Click here for ROOT file with transverse electrons ntuple.
- Longitudinal running
- MuDst are located at:
/star/institutions/iucf/hew/2006ppLongRuns/
- Click here for SMD profiles of longitudinal electron candidates.
- Click here for ROOT file with longitudinal electrons ntuple.
- Code
-
f(x)=p0*(0.69*exp(-0.5*((x-p1)/0.87)**2)/(sqrt(2*pi)*0.87)+0.31*exp(-0.5*((x-p1)/3.3)**2)/(sqrt(2*pi)*3.3))
-
p0 = yield
-
p1 = centroid
Figure 1: Number of tracks surviving each successive cut
Figure 2a: Number of tracks per trigger id for all electron candidates. Most common trigger ids are:
127652
eemc-jp0-etot-mb-L2jet
EEMC JP > th0 (32, 4 GeV) and ETOT > TH (109, 14 GeV), minbias condition, L2 Jet algorithm, reading out slow detectors, transverse running
127271
eemc-jp1-mb
EEMC JP > th1 (49, 8 GeV) && mb, reading out slow detectors, transverse running
127641
eemc-http-mb-l2gamma
EEMC HT > th1 (12, 2.6 GeV, run < 7100052;13, 2.8 GeV, run >=7100052) and TP > TH1 (17, 3.8 GeV, run < 710052; 21, 4.7 GeV, run>=7100052 ), minbias condition, L2 Gamma algorithm, reading out slow detectors, L2 thresholds at 3.4, 5.4, transverse running
127622
bemc-jp0-etot-mb-L2jet
BEMC JP > th0 (42, 4 GeV) and ETOT > TH (109, 14 GeV), minbias condition, L2 Jet algorithm, reading out slow detectors, transverse running; L2jet thresholds at 8.0,3.6,3.3
Figure 2b: Number of tracks per trigger id for all electron candidates for pT > 4 GeV. The dominant trigger ids become:
127641 | eemc-http-mb-l2gamma | EEMC HT > th1 (12, 2.6 GeV, run < 7100052;13, 2.8 GeV, run >=7100052) and TP > TH1 (17, 3.8 GeV, run < 710052; 21, 4.7 GeV, run>=7100052 ), minbias condition, L2 Gamma algorithm, reading out slow detectors, L2 thresholds at 3.4, 5.4, transverse running |
127262 | eemc-ht2-mb-emul | EEMC HT > th2 (22, 5.0 GeV) && mb, reading out slow detectors, emulated in L2, transverse running, different threshold from 117262 |
127271 | eemc-jp1-mb | EEMC JP > th1 (49, 8 GeV) && mb, reading out slow detectors, transverse running |
127652 | eemc-jp0-etot-mb-L2jet | EEMC JP > th0 (32, 4 GeV) and ETOT > TH (109, 14 GeV), minbias condition, L2 Jet algorithm, reading out slow detectors, transverse running |
Figure 3: pT distribution of tracks before E/p, dE/dx and pT cut
Figure 4: pT distribution of electron candidates with pT > 4 GeV
Figure 5: η distribution of electron candidates (all pT)
Figure 6: φ distribution of electron candidates (all pT)
Figure 7: dE/dx of tracks before E/p and dE/dx cuts (all pT)
Figure 8: dE/dx of tracks before E/p and dE/dx cuts (pT > 4 GeV)
Figure 9: dE/dx of tracks before E/p and dE/dx cuts (all pT and 0.8 < η < 1.0)
Figure 10: dE/dx of tracks before E/p and dE/dx cuts (all pT and 1.0 < η < 1.2)
Figure 11: dE/dx of tracks before E/p and dE/dx cuts (all pT and 1.2 < η < 1.4)
Figure 12: dE/dx of tracks before E/p and dE/dx cuts (all pT and 1.4 < η < 1.6)
Figure 13: dE/dx of tracks before E/p and dE/dx cuts (all pT and 1.6 < η < 1.8)
Figure 14: dE/dx of tracks before E/p and dE/dx cuts (all pT and 1.8 < η < 2.0)
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.2: The dominant trigger ids are:
137273 | eemc-jp1-mb | EEMC JP > th1 (52, 8.7 GeV) && mb, reading out slow detectors, longitudinal running 2 |
137641 | eemc-http-mb-l2gamma | EEMC HT > th1 (16, 3.5 GeV) and TP > th1 (20, 4.5 GeV), minbias condition, L2 Gamma algorithm, reading out slow detectors, L2 thresholds at 3.7, 5.2, longitudinal running 2 |
137262 | eemc-ht2-mb-emul | EEMC HT > th2 (22, 5.0 GeV) && mb, reading out slow detectors, emulated in L2, longitudinal running 2 |
137222 | bemc-jp1-mb | BEMC JP > th1 (60, 8.3 GeV) && mb, reading out slow detectors, longitudinal running 2 |
Figure 2.3a
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.7
Figure 2.8
Figure 2.9
Figure 2.10
Click here for a tarball of the code used in this analysis.
SMD response function
Transverse
21 electrons
Longitudinal
99 electrons
Pibero Djawotho Last updated Wed Sep 12 08:29:53 EDT 2007
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments