- Bulk correlations
- Common
- GPC Paper Review: ANN-ASS pp Elastic Scattering at 200 GeV
- Hard Probes
- Heavy Flavor
- Jet-like correlations
- LFS-UPC
- Measurement of Single Transverse Spin Asymmetry, A_N in Proton–Proton Elastic Scattering at √s = 510 GeV
- Other Groups
- Peripheral Collisions
- Spin
- Spin PWG
- Results and data
- Spin/Cold-QCD Older Physics Analysis
- 2006 EEMC Neutral Pion Cross Section and A_LL
- 2006 Gamma + Jet
- 2009 Lambda D_LL @ 200 GeV
- 2009 dijet x-sect/A_LL @ 200 GeV
- 2011 FMS Jet-like correlations @ 500 GeV
- 2011 FMS inclusive pions @ 500 GeV
- 2011 IFF @ 500 GeV
- 2011 Pions in Jets A_UT @ 500 GeV
- 2012 EEMC Neutral Pion A_LL
- 2012 IFF @ 200 GeV
- 2012 Jet A_LL @ 500 GeV
- 2012 Lambda D_TT @200GeV
- 2012 Pi0 - Jet A_LL @ 500
- 2012 Pions in Jets A_UT @ 200 GeV
- 2012 dijet A_LL @ 500
- 2012/13 FMS A_LL @ 500 GeV
- 2013 Di-jet A_LL @ 500 GeV
- A New Users Guide to PDSF Success
- Analyses from the early years
- (A) List of Physics Analysis Projects (obsolete)
- Common Analysis Trees
- EEMC Direct Photon Studies (Pibero Djawotho, 2006-2008)
- 2006.07.31 First Look at SMD gamma/pi0 Discrimination
- 2006.08.04 Second Look at SMD gamma/pi0 Discrimination
- 2006.08.06 Comparison between EEMC fast and slow simulator
- 2006.09.15 Fit Parameters
- 2007.02.05 Reconstructed/Monte Carlo Photon Energy
- 2007.02.08 E_reco / E_mc vs. eta
- 2007.02.11 Reconstructed/Monte Carlo Muon Energy
- 2007.02.15 160 GeV photons
- 2007.02.15 20 GeV photons
- 2007.02.15 80 GeV photons
- 2007.02.15 Reconstructed/Monte Carlo Electron Energy
- 2007.02.19 10 GeV photons
- 2007.02.19 40 GeV photons
- 2007.02.19 5 GeV photons
- 2007.02.19 Summary of Reconstructed/Monte Carlo Photon Energy
- 2007.05.24 gamma/pi0 separation in EEMC using linear cut
- 2007.05.24 gamma/pi0 separation in EEMC using quadratic cut
- 2007.05.24 gamma/pi0 separation in EEMC using quadratic cut
- 2007.05.30 Efficiency of reconstructing photons in EEMC
- 2007.06.12 gamma/pi0 separation in EEMC at pT 5-10 GeV
- 2007.06.28 Photons in Pythia
- 2007.07.09 How to run the gamma fitter
- 2007.07.25 Revised gamma/pi0 algorithm in 2006 p+p collisions at sqrt(s)=200 GeV
- 2007.09.12 Endcap Electrons
- 2008.01.23 Endcap etas
- 2008.02.27 ESMD shape library
- 2008.02.28 ESMD QA for run 7136033
- 2008.03.04 A second look at eta mesons in the STAR Endcap Calorimeter
- 2008.03.08 Adding the SMD energy to E_reco/E_MC for Photons
- 2008.03.21 Chi square method
- 2008.04.08 Data-Driven Shower Shapes
- 2008.04.12 Data-Driven Residuals
- 2008.04.12 Pythia Gamma-Jets
- 2008.04.16 Jet Finder QA
- 2008.04.20 BUR 2009
- 2008.04.22 Run 6 Photon Yield Per Trigger
- 2008.05.07 Number of Jets
- 2008.05.09 Gamma-jets pT distributions
- 2008.05.19 Binning the shower shape library
- 2008.06.03 Jet A_LL Systematics
- 2008.06.18 Photon-jet reconstruction with the EEMC - Part 2 (STAR Collaboration Meeting - UC Davis)
- 2008.07.16 Extracting A_LL and DeltaG
- 2008.07.20 How to install Pythia 6 and 8 on your laptop?
- 2008.07.23 Hot Strips Identified by Hal Spinka
- 2008.07.24 Strips from Weihong's 2006 ppLong 20 runs
- G/h Discrimination Algorithm (Willie)
- Neutral Pions 2005: Frank Simon
- Neutral strange particle transverse asymmetries (tpb)
- Photon-jet with the Endcap (Ilya Selyuzhenkov)
- Relative Luminosity Analysis
- Run 6 Dijet Cross Section (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 6 Dijet Double Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 6 Inclusive Jet Cross Section (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 6 Neutral Pions
- Run 6 Relative Luminosity (Tai Sakuma)
- Run 8 trigger planning (Jim Sowinski)
- Run 9
- Beam Polarizations
- Charged Pions
- Fully Reconstructed Ws
- Jet Trees
- W 2009 analysis , pp 500 GeV
- W 2011 AL
- W 2012 AL (begins here)
- W/Z 2013 Analysis
- Useful Links
- Weekly PWG Meetings
- Working Group Members
- Yearly Tasks
2008.02.27 ESMD shape library
Updated on Fri, 2010-07-16 11:07. Originally created by seluzhen on 2010-07-16 10:39.
Under:
Hal Spinka Pibero Djawotho Last modified Wed Feb 27 09:51:27 EST 2008
ESMD shape library
Shower Widths for Monte Carlo and Data
Description
Hal did a comparison of the widths of the shower shapes between Monte Carlo and data. Below is a description of what was done.
I took the nominal central value, either from the maxHit or the nominal central value, and added the energy in the +/- 12 strips. Then I computed the mean strip (which may have been different from the nominal central value!!). I normalized the shape to give unit area for each smd cluster, and added to the histograms separately for U and V and for MC and data (= Will's events). I did NOT handle Will's events correctly, just using whatever event was chosen randomly, rather than going through his list sequentially. Note I ran 1000 events, and got 94 events in my shower shape histos. So, there are several minor problems. 1) I didn't go through Will's events sequentially. 2) I normalized, but perhaps not to the correct 25 strips, because the mean strip and the nominal strip may have differed. 3) there may have been a cutoff on some events due to being close to one end of the smd plane (near strip 0 or 287). My sense from looking at the plots is that these don't matter much. The conclusion is that the MC shape is significantly narrower than the shape from Will's events, which is obviously narrower than the random clusters we were using at first with no selection for the etas. Hence, we are not wasting our time with this project.
- Monte Carlo U shower shape
- Monte Carlo V shower shape
- SMDU shower shape (Will's selection)
- SMDV shower shape (Will's selection)
- Energy Asymmetry
- Index of Library Entry
Decsription of Pythia Sample
A few histograms were added to the code:
- MC is Pythia gamma-jet at partonic pT 9-11 GeV with gamma in the Endcap
- Data is from Will Jacobs golden events from Weihong sample
- Require no conversion
- Require all hits from direct photon in same sector
Figure 1:
Data vs. MC mean u-strip
Figure 2:
Data vs. MC mean v-strip
Figure 3:
Data vs. MC u-strip sigma
Figure 4:
Data vs. MC v-strip sigma
Figure 5:
MC E
v
vs. E
u
Figure 6:
Data E
v
vs. E
u
Figure 7:
MC energy asymmetry in SMD planes
Figure 8:
Data energy asymmetry in SMD planes
Figure 9:
Shower shape library index used (picked at random)
Single events shower shapes are displayed in
or
.
- green = projected position of direct photon in the Endcap
- blue = Monte Carlo SMD response
- red = Data SMD response
Hal Spinka Pibero Djawotho Last modified Wed Feb 27 09:51:27 EST 2008
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments